Опечатка

Typographical error - mistake made in typing printed material. Article “Опечатка” in Russian Wikipedia has 22.1 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 6 references and 5 sections.

This article has the best quality in English Wikipedia. Also, this article is the most popular in that (Russian) language version.

Since the creation of article “Опечатка”, its content was written by 55 registered users of Russian Wikipedia and edited by 1346 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.

The article is cited 31 times in Russian Wikipedia and cited 62113 times in all languages (2621^st place).

The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:

• Local (Russian): #4116 in August 2009
• Global: #8403 in February 2005

The highest popularity rank from 2008:

• Local (Russian): #44692 in August 2008
• Global: #13565 in May 2013

There are 24 language versions for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).

The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).

The table below shows the language versions of the article with the highest quality.

#	Language	Quality grade	Quality score
1	English (en) Typographical error		49.4528
2	Japanese (ja) 誤植		41.0294
3	Chinese (zh) 誤植		36.2925
4	French (fr) Coquille (typographie)		32.2892
5	Latin (la) Mendum typographicum		30.2822
6	Dutch (nl) Typefout		29.1386
7	Polish (pl) Błędy typograficzne		27.6858
8	Ukrainian (uk) Друкарська помилка		26.4786
9	Russian (ru) Опечатка		22.053
10	German (de) Tippfehler		20.7283

More...

The following table shows the most popular language versions of the article.

The most popular language versions of the article "Опечатка" in all the time

#	Language	Popularity award	Relative popularity
1	English (en) Typographical error		2 107 395
2	Japanese (ja) 誤植		1 197 501
3	Italian (it) Refuso		733 858
4	French (fr) Coquille (typographie)		388 047
5	Russian (ru) Опечатка		158 601
6	German (de) Tippfehler		155 372
7	Indonesian (id) Kesalahan tipografi		105 278
8	Chinese (zh) 誤植		90 190
9	Dutch (nl) Typefout		62 667
10	Portuguese (pt) Erro tipográfico		48 027

More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest popularity in the last month.

The most popular language versions of the article "Опечатка" in June 2025

#	Language	Popularity award	Relative popularity
1	English (en) Typographical error		4 895
2	Japanese (ja) 誤植		1 912
3	Polish (pl) Błędy typograficzne		535
4	French (fr) Coquille (typographie)		497
5	Russian (ru) Опечатка		474
6	Italian (it) Refuso		435
7	Finnish (fi) Kirjoitusvirhe		327
8	Chinese (zh) 誤植		284
9	German (de) Tippfehler		159
10	Simple English (simple) Typographical error		148

More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest.

Language versions of the article "Опечатка" with the highest Authors Interest (number of authors). Only registered Wikipedia users were taken into account.

#	Language	AI award	Relative AI
1	English (en) Typographical error		500
2	Japanese (ja) 誤植		280
3	German (de) Tippfehler		96
4	French (fr) Coquille (typographie)		80
5	Dutch (nl) Typefout		55
6	Russian (ru) Опечатка		55
7	Italian (it) Refuso		54
8	Finnish (fi) Kirjoitusvirhe		43
9	Hebrew (he) טעות דפוס		24
10	Korean (ko) 오식		21

More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest in the last month.

Language versions of the article "Опечатка" with the highest AI in June 2025

#	Language	AI award	Relative AI
1	Japanese (ja) 誤植		5
2	Arabic (ar) خطأ مطبعي		0
3	Czech (cs) Překlep		0
4	German (de) Tippfehler		0
5	English (en) Typographical error		0
6	Esperanto (eo) Tajperaro		0
7	Persian (fa) اشتباه تایپی		0
8	Finnish (fi) Kirjoitusvirhe		0
9	French (fr) Coquille (typographie)		0
10	Hebrew (he) טעות דפוס		0

More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest number of citations.

Language versions of the article "Опечатка" with the highest Citation Index (CI)

#	Language	CI award	Relative CI
1	English (en) Typographical error		60 634
2	Chinese (zh) 誤植		759
3	Japanese (ja) 誤植		257
4	French (fr) Coquille (typographie)		76
5	German (de) Tippfehler		40
6	Italian (it) Refuso		39
7	Hebrew (he) טעות דפוס		37
8	Polish (pl) Błędy typograficzne		36
9	Russian (ru) Опечатка		31
10	Esperanto (eo) Tajperaro		28

More...

#	Language	Value
ar	Arabic خطأ مطبعي
cs	Czech Překlep
de	German Tippfehler
en	English Typographical error
eo	Esperanto Tajperaro
fa	Persian اشتباه تایپی
fi	Finnish Kirjoitusvirhe
fr	French Coquille (typographie)
he	Hebrew טעות דפוס
hi	Hindi टंकणगत अशुद्धि
hr	Croatian Zatipak
id	Indonesian Kesalahan tipografi
it	Italian Refuso
ja	Japanese 誤植
ko	Korean 오식
la	Latin Mendum typographicum
nl	Dutch Typefout
pl	Polish Błędy typograficzne
pt	Portuguese Erro tipográfico
ru	Russian Опечатка
simple	Simple English Typographical error
tr	Turkish Yazım hatası
uk	Ukrainian Друкарська помилка
zh	Chinese 誤植

Best Rank

Russian: #44692 08.2008

Global: #13565 05.2013

Best Rank

Russian: #4116 08.2009

Global: #8403 02.2005

On 12 August 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Cristiano Ronaldo, Wednesday, Georgina Rodríguez, ChatGPT, Weapons, Jenna Ortega, deaths in 2025, Taylor Swift, Miguel Uribe Turbay, 2025–26 UEFA Champions League.

In Russian Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Яндекс, Главы Курска, Анкоридж, Аляска, Уэнздей (2-й сезон), Катастрофа АПЛ «Курск», Бутусов, Юрий Николаевич, Продажа Аляски, К-141 «Курск», Корж, Макс.

The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information