Mendum typographicum

Typographical error - mistake made in typing printed material. Article "Mendum typographicum" in Latin Wikipedia has 30.3 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article contains 3 references and 2 sections.

This article has the best quality in English Wikipedia. Also, this article is the most popular in that language version.

Since the creation of article "Mendum typographicum", its content was written by 3 registered users of Latin Wikipedia and edited by 1319 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.

The article is cited 4 times in Latin Wikipedia and cited 54684 times in all languages (2846^th place).

The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:

• Local (Latin): #10899 in May 2012
• Global: #8401 in February 2005

The highest popularity rank from 2008:

• Local (Latin): #626 in February 2023
• Global: #13569 in May 2013

There are 24 language versions for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).

The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).

The table below shows the language versions of the article with the highest quality.

#	Language	Quality grade	Quality score
1	English (en) Typographical error		49.5656
2	Japanese (ja) 誤植		41.0993
3	Chinese (zh) 誤植		35.6874
4	French (fr) Coquille (typographie)		32.436
5	Latin (la) Mendum typographicum		30.2852
6	Dutch (nl) Typefout		29.5896
7	Polish (pl) Błędy typograficzne		27.1696
8	Ukrainian (uk) Одрук		23.7465
9	German (de) Tippfehler		20.8858
10	Russian (ru) Опечатка		20.5214

More...

The following table shows the most popular language versions of the article.

The most popular language versions of the article "Mendum typographicum" in all the time

#	Language	Popularity award	Relative popularity
1	English (en) Typographical error		2 061 358
2	Japanese (ja) 誤植		1 174 787
3	Italian (it) Refuso		727 614
4	French (fr) Coquille (typographie)		377 188
5	German (de) Tippfehler		151 996
6	Russian (ru) Опечатка		148 768
7	Indonesian (id) Kesalahan tipografi		103 376
8	Chinese (zh) 誤植		85 443
9	Dutch (nl) Typefout		61 662
10	Portuguese (pt) Erro tipográfico		46 773

More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest popularity in the last month.

The most popular language versions of the article "Mendum typographicum" in July 2024

#	Language	Popularity award	Relative popularity
1	English (en) Typographical error		4 494
2	Japanese (ja) 誤植		2 706
3	Russian (ru) Опечатка		771
4	Italian (it) Refuso		598
5	French (fr) Coquille (typographie)		564
6	German (de) Tippfehler		511
7	Indonesian (id) Kesalahan tipografi		414
8	Chinese (zh) 誤植		362
9	Polish (pl) Błędy typograficzne		266
10	Portuguese (pt) Erro tipográfico		135

More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest.

Language versions of the article "Mendum typographicum" with the highest Authors Interest (number of authors). Only registered Wikipedia users were taken into account.

#	Language	AI award	Relative AI
1	English (en) Typographical error		499
2	Japanese (ja) 誤植		273
3	German (de) Tippfehler		95
4	French (fr) Coquille (typographie)		78
5	Dutch (nl) Typefout		55
6	Italian (it) Refuso		54
7	Russian (ru) Опечатка		52
8	Finnish (fi) Kirjoitusvirhe		43
9	Hebrew (he) טעות דפוס		24
10	Korean (ko) 오식		20

More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest in the last month.

Language versions of the article "Mendum typographicum" with the highest AI in July 2024

#	Language	AI award	Relative AI
1	German (de) Tippfehler		1
2	English (en) Typographical error		1
3	French (fr) Coquille (typographie)		1
4	Hindi (hi) टंकणगत अशुद्धि		1
5	Japanese (ja) 誤植		1
6	Russian (ru) Опечатка		1
7	Turkish (tr) Yazım hatası		1
8	Ukrainian (uk) Одрук		1
9	Arabic (ar) خطأ مطبعي		0
10	Czech (cs) Překlep		0

More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest number of citations.

Language versions of the article "Mendum typographicum" with the highest Citation Index (CI)

#	Language	CI award	Relative CI
1	English (en) Typographical error		53 463
2	Chinese (zh) 誤植		572
3	Japanese (ja) 誤植		244
4	French (fr) Coquille (typographie)		75
5	German (de) Tippfehler		38
6	Italian (it) Refuso		38
7	Hebrew (he) טעות דפוס		34
8	Polish (pl) Błędy typograficzne		31
9	Russian (ru) Опечатка		28
10	Portuguese (pt) Erro tipográfico		24

More...

#	Language	Value
ar	Arabic خطأ مطبعي
cs	Czech Překlep
de	German Tippfehler
en	English Typographical error
eo	Esperanto Tajperaro
fa	Persian اشتباه تایپی
fi	Finnish Kirjoitusvirhe
fr	French Coquille (typographie)
he	Hebrew טעות דפוס
hi	Hindi टंकणगत अशुद्धि
hr	Croatian Zatipak
id	Indonesian Kesalahan tipografi
it	Italian Refuso
ja	Japanese 誤植
ko	Korean 오식
la	Latin Mendum typographicum
nl	Dutch Typefout
pl	Polish Błędy typograficzne
pt	Portuguese Erro tipográfico
ru	Russian Опечатка
simple	Simple English Typographical error
tr	Turkish Yazım hatası
uk	Ukrainian Одрук
zh	Chinese 誤植

Best Rank

Latin: #626 02.2023

Global: #13569 05.2013

Best Rank

Latin: #10899 05.2012

Global: #8401 02.2005

On 12 March 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Elon Musk, 2024–25 UEFA Champions League, UEFA Champions League, Diego Simeone, Kim Sae-ron, Kim Soo-hyun, Greenland, Giuliano Simeone, Donald Trump, ChatGPT.

In Latin Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Ecclesia Catholica Romana, Christophorus Hogwood, Shrek (2001 pellicula), Anomalocaris, Donaldus Trump, Elon Musk, The Departed (pellicula 2006), Lingua Latina, Oppenheimer (pellicula 2023), Christianus Wernicke.

The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information