Roodkopwinteruil

nl

WikiRank.net
ver. 1.6.2

Roodkopwinteruil

Quality:

Conistra erythrocephala - species of insect. Article “Roodkopwinteruil” in Dutch Wikipedia has 4.4 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 0 references and 3 sections.

This article has the best quality in Swedish Wikipedia. However, the most popular language version of this article is English.

Since the creation of article “Roodkopwinteruil”, its content was written by 11 registered users of Dutch Wikipedia and edited by 79 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.

The article is cited 18 times in Dutch Wikipedia and cited 72 times in all languages.

The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:

  • Local (Dutch): #8215 in August 2017
  • Global: #129483 in June 2014

The highest popularity rank from 2008:

  • Local (Dutch): #261498 in May 2010
  • Global: #2047926 in April 2009

There are 7 language versions for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).

The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).

The table below shows the language versions of the article with the highest quality.

Languages with the highest quality

#LanguageQuality gradeQuality score
1Swedish (sv)
Gulhövdat plattfly
31.0396
2German (de)
Rotkopf-Wintereule
23.3765
3English (en)
Conistra erythrocephala
22.8146
4Vietnamese (vi)
Conistra erythrocephala
21.2248
5Norwegian (no)
Rødlig flatfly
16.2516
6Hungarian (hu)
Vörösfejű őszibagoly
5.9769
7Dutch (nl)
Roodkopwinteruil
4.351
More...

The following table shows the most popular language versions of the article.

Most popular in all the time

The most popular language versions of the article "Roodkopwinteruil" in all the time
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1German (de)
Rotkopf-Wintereule
6 575
2English (en)
Conistra erythrocephala
5 747
3Dutch (nl)
Roodkopwinteruil
3 002
4Norwegian (no)
Rødlig flatfly
1 772
5Hungarian (hu)
Vörösfejű őszibagoly
1 507
6Swedish (sv)
Gulhövdat plattfly
668
7Vietnamese (vi)
Conistra erythrocephala
243
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest popularity in the last month.

Most popular in June 2025

The most popular language versions of the article "Roodkopwinteruil" in June 2025
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Conistra erythrocephala
40
2German (de)
Rotkopf-Wintereule
13
3Hungarian (hu)
Vörösfejű őszibagoly
10
4Dutch (nl)
Roodkopwinteruil
5
5Swedish (sv)
Gulhövdat plattfly
3
6Norwegian (no)
Rødlig flatfly
1
7Vietnamese (vi)
Conistra erythrocephala
0
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest.

The highest AI

Language versions of the article "Roodkopwinteruil" with the highest Authors Interest (number of authors). Only registered Wikipedia users were taken into account.
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1English (en)
Conistra erythrocephala
20
2German (de)
Rotkopf-Wintereule
19
3Norwegian (no)
Rødlig flatfly
18
4Dutch (nl)
Roodkopwinteruil
11
5Hungarian (hu)
Vörösfejű őszibagoly
7
6Vietnamese (vi)
Conistra erythrocephala
4
7Swedish (sv)
Gulhövdat plattfly
0
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest in the last month.

The highest AI in June 2025

Language versions of the article "Roodkopwinteruil" with the highest AI in June 2025
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1German (de)
Rotkopf-Wintereule
0
2English (en)
Conistra erythrocephala
0
3Hungarian (hu)
Vörösfejű őszibagoly
0
4Dutch (nl)
Roodkopwinteruil
0
5Norwegian (no)
Rødlig flatfly
0
6Swedish (sv)
Gulhövdat plattfly
0
7Vietnamese (vi)
Conistra erythrocephala
0
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest number of citations.

The highest CI

Language versions of the article "Roodkopwinteruil" with the highest Citation Index (CI)
#LanguageCI awardRelative CI
1English (en)
Conistra erythrocephala
35
2Dutch (nl)
Roodkopwinteruil
18
3German (de)
Rotkopf-Wintereule
6
4Norwegian (no)
Rødlig flatfly
6
5Hungarian (hu)
Vörösfejű őszibagoly
4
6Swedish (sv)
Gulhövdat plattfly
2
7Vietnamese (vi)
Conistra erythrocephala
1
More...

Scores

Estimated value for Wikipedia:
Dutch:
Global:
Popularity in June 2025:
Dutch:
Global:
Popularity in all years:
Dutch:
Global:
Authors in June 2025:
Dutch:
Global:
Registered authors in all years:
Dutch:
Global:
Citations:
Dutch:
Global:

Quality measures

Interwikis

#LanguageValue
deGerman
Rotkopf-Wintereule
enEnglish
Conistra erythrocephala
huHungarian
Vörösfejű őszibagoly
nlDutch
Roodkopwinteruil
noNorwegian
Rødlig flatfly
svSwedish
Gulhövdat plattfly
viVietnamese
Conistra erythrocephala

Popularity rank trends

Best Rank Dutch:
#261498
05.2010
Global:
#2047926
04.2009

AI rank trends

Best Rank Dutch:
#8215
08.2017
Global:
#129483
06.2014

Local AI rank history

Languages comparison

Important global interconnections (July 2024 – June 2025)

Cumulative results of quality and popularity of the Wikipedia article

List of Wikipedia articles in different languages (starting with the most popular):

News from 16 March 2026

On 16 March 2026 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: 98th Academy Awards, Michael B. Jordan, Sinners, Jessie Buckley, Paul Thomas Anderson, Sean Penn, One Battle After Another, Amy Madigan, Hamnet, Timothée Chalamet.

In Dutch Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Hans van Willigenburg (televisiepresentator), Moord op Marianne Vaatstra, Joran van der Sloot, Sean Penn, Maurizio Gucci, Gucci, Patrizia Reggiani, Michael B. Jordan, Maaike Schoon, Silvio Erkens.

About WikiRank

The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information