存在の誤謬

ja

WikiRank.net
ver. 1.6.2

存在の誤謬

Quality:

Existential fallacy - type of formal fallacy. Article “存在の誤謬” in Japanese Wikipedia has 17.8 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 15 references and 4 sections.

In this language version of Wikipedia the article has the best quality. However, the most popular language version of this article is English.

Since the creation of article “存在の誤謬”, its content was written by 2 registered users of Japanese Wikipedia and edited by 66 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.

The article is cited 2 times in Japanese Wikipedia and cited 599 times in all languages.

The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:

  • Local (Japanese): #33472 in February 2024
  • Global: #111310 in July 2004

The highest popularity rank from 2008:

  • Local (Japanese): #486834 in February 2024
  • Global: #481117 in October 2008

There are 7 language versions for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).

The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).

The table below shows the language versions of the article with the highest quality.

Languages with the highest quality

#LanguageQuality gradeQuality score
1Japanese (ja)
存在の誤謬
17.7879
2Persian (fa)
مغالطه افراد غیرموجود
15.8543
3Turkish (tr)
Varoluşsal safsata
11.0557
4English (en)
Existential fallacy
11.0326
5Chinese (zh)
存在性謬誤
9.3559
6Arabic (ar)
مغالطة وجودية
8.0593
7Hebrew (he)
כשל קיומי
1.3503
More...

The following table shows the most popular language versions of the article.

Most popular in all the time

The most popular language versions of the article "存在の誤謬" in all the time
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Existential fallacy
336 462
2Chinese (zh)
存在性謬誤
22 647
3Hebrew (he)
כשל קיומי
6 859
4Arabic (ar)
مغالطة وجودية
2 667
5Japanese (ja)
存在の誤謬
1 012
6Turkish (tr)
Varoluşsal safsata
771
7Persian (fa)
مغالطه افراد غیرموجود
163
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest popularity in the last month.

Most popular in June 2025

The most popular language versions of the article "存在の誤謬" in June 2025
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Existential fallacy
1 252
2Chinese (zh)
存在性謬誤
91
3Japanese (ja)
存在の誤謬
52
4Arabic (ar)
مغالطة وجودية
24
5Persian (fa)
مغالطه افراد غیرموجود
19
6Turkish (tr)
Varoluşsal safsata
19
7Hebrew (he)
כשל קיומי
13
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest.

The highest AI

Language versions of the article "存在の誤謬" with the highest Authors Interest (number of authors). Only registered Wikipedia users were taken into account.
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1English (en)
Existential fallacy
43
2Hebrew (he)
כשל קיומי
9
3Chinese (zh)
存在性謬誤
5
4Arabic (ar)
مغالطة وجودية
3
5Turkish (tr)
Varoluşsal safsata
3
6Japanese (ja)
存在の誤謬
2
7Persian (fa)
مغالطه افراد غیرموجود
1
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest in the last month.

The highest AI in June 2025

Language versions of the article "存在の誤謬" with the highest AI in June 2025
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1English (en)
Existential fallacy
1
2Arabic (ar)
مغالطة وجودية
0
3Persian (fa)
مغالطه افراد غیرموجود
0
4Hebrew (he)
כשל קיומי
0
5Japanese (ja)
存在の誤謬
0
6Turkish (tr)
Varoluşsal safsata
0
7Chinese (zh)
存在性謬誤
0
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest number of citations.

The highest CI

Language versions of the article "存在の誤謬" with the highest Citation Index (CI)
#LanguageCI awardRelative CI
1Chinese (zh)
存在性謬誤
195
2English (en)
Existential fallacy
163
3Arabic (ar)
مغالطة وجودية
146
4Hebrew (he)
כשל קיומי
45
5Persian (fa)
مغالطه افراد غیرموجود
37
6Turkish (tr)
Varoluşsal safsata
11
7Japanese (ja)
存在の誤謬
2
More...

Scores

Estimated value for Wikipedia:
Japanese:
Global:
Popularity in June 2025:
Japanese:
Global:
Popularity in all years:
Japanese:
Global:
Authors in June 2025:
Japanese:
Global:
Registered authors in all years:
Japanese:
Global:
Citations:
Japanese:
Global:

Quality measures

Interwikis

#LanguageValue
arArabic
مغالطة وجودية
enEnglish
Existential fallacy
faPersian
مغالطه افراد غیرموجود
heHebrew
כשל קיומי
jaJapanese
存在の誤謬
trTurkish
Varoluşsal safsata
zhChinese
存在性謬誤

Popularity rank trends

Best Rank Japanese:
#486834
02.2024
Global:
#481117
10.2008

AI rank trends

Best Rank Japanese:
#33472
02.2024
Global:
#111310
07.2004

Languages comparison

Important global interconnections (July 2024 – June 2025)

Wikipedia readers most often find their way to information on Existential fallacy from Wikipedia articles about List of fallacies, Existential instantiation, Syllogism, Bertrand Russell and Instantiation. Whereas reading the article about Existential fallacy people most often go to Wikipedia articles on Affirming the consequent, Syllogism, Vacuous truth, Enthymeme and Existential instantiation.

Cumulative results of quality and popularity of the Wikipedia article

List of Wikipedia articles in different languages (starting with the most popular):

News from 16 March 2026

On 16 March 2026 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: 98th Academy Awards, Michael B. Jordan, Sinners, Jessie Buckley, Paul Thomas Anderson, Sean Penn, One Battle After Another, Amy Madigan, Hamnet, Timothée Chalamet.

In Japanese Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: 小泉八雲, 同志社国際中学校・高等学校, 若嶋津六夫, 伊藤大海 (野球), 高橋成美, 井端弘和, 太田裕二, ワールド・ベースボール・クラシック, 高田みづえ, 尾崎将司.

About WikiRank

The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information