古典派の二分法

Classical dichotomy - the idea, attributed to classical/pre-Keynesian economics, that real variables (output and real interest rates) and nominal variables (money value of output and the interest rate) can be analyzed separately. Article "古典派の二分法" in Japanese Wikipedia has 4.4 points for quality (as of November 1, 2023). The article contains 1 references and 3 sections.

This article has the best quality in French Wikipedia. However, the most popular language version of this article is English.

Since the creation of article "古典派の二分法", its content was written by 4 registered users of Japanese Wikipedia and edited by 94 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.

The article is cited 4 times in Japanese Wikipedia and cited 105 times in all languages.

The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:

• Local (Japanese): #28666 in September 2015
• Global: #74971 in January 2006

The highest popularity rank from 2008:

• Local (Japanese): #206718 in January 2021
• Global: #278369 in April 2013

There are 11 language versions for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).

The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from November 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).

下表顯示了最高品質的文章的語言版本。

#	Language	Quality grade	Quality score
1	French (fr) Dichotomie classique		18.9682
2	Spanish (es) Dicotomía clásica		9.1741
3	English (en) Classical dichotomy		6.786
4	Azerbaijani (az) Klassik dixotomiya		6.7339
5	Dutch (nl) Klassieke dichotomie		5.3955
6	Portuguese (pt) Dicotomia clássica		4.7643
7	Persian (fa) دوگانگی کلاسیک		4.6967
8	Japanese (ja) 古典派の二分法		4.4477
9	German (de) Klassische Dichotomie		1.5382
10	Korean (ko) 고전학파의 이분법		0.3894

More...

The following table shows the most popular language versions of the article.

The most popular language versions of the article "古典派の二分法" in all the time

#	Language	Popularity award	Relative popularity
1	English (en) Classical dichotomy		382 964
2	German (de) Klassische Dichotomie		94 541
3	Spanish (es) Dicotomía clásica		49 058
4	French (fr) Dichotomie classique		42 430
5	Portuguese (pt) Dicotomia clássica		30 069
6	Korean (ko) 고전학파의 이분법		19 829
7	Japanese (ja) 古典派の二分法		16 814
8	Dutch (nl) Klassieke dichotomie		8 278
9	Swedish (sv) Klassiska dikotomin		4 994
10	Persian (fa) دوگانگی کلاسیک		1 078

More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest popularity in the last month.

The most popular language versions of the article "古典派の二分法" in October 2023

#	Language	Popularity award	Relative popularity
1	English (en) Classical dichotomy		967
2	French (fr) Dichotomie classique		428
3	Korean (ko) 고전학파의 이분법		216
4	Spanish (es) Dicotomía clásica		208
5	Japanese (ja) 古典派の二分法		115
6	German (de) Klassische Dichotomie		78
7	Portuguese (pt) Dicotomia clássica		53
8	Azerbaijani (az) Klassik dixotomiya		20
9	Dutch (nl) Klassieke dichotomie		20
10	Persian (fa) دوگانگی کلاسیک		16

More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest.

Language versions of the article "古典派の二分法" with the highest Authors Interest (number of authors). Only registered Wikipedia users were taken into account.

#	Language	AI award	Relative AI
1	English (en) Classical dichotomy		36
2	German (de) Klassische Dichotomie		21
3	French (fr) Dichotomie classique		8
4	Spanish (es) Dicotomía clásica		5
5	Portuguese (pt) Dicotomia clássica		5
6	Swedish (sv) Klassiska dikotomin		5
7	Japanese (ja) 古典派の二分法		4
8	Persian (fa) دوگانگی کلاسیک		3
9	Dutch (nl) Klassieke dichotomie		3
10	Azerbaijani (az) Klassik dixotomiya		2

More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest in the last month.

Language versions of the article "古典派の二分法" with the highest AI in October 2023

#	Language	AI award	Relative AI
1	Azerbaijani (az) Klassik dixotomiya		0
2	German (de) Klassische Dichotomie		0
3	English (en) Classical dichotomy		0
4	Spanish (es) Dicotomía clásica		0
5	Persian (fa) دوگانگی کلاسیک		0
6	French (fr) Dichotomie classique		0
7	Japanese (ja) 古典派の二分法		0
8	Korean (ko) 고전학파의 이분법		0
9	Dutch (nl) Klassieke dichotomie		0
10	Portuguese (pt) Dicotomia clássica		0

More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest number of citations.

Language versions of the article "古典派の二分法" with the highest Citation Index (CI)

#	Language	CI award	Relative CI
1	Portuguese (pt) Dicotomia clássica		50
2	English (en) Classical dichotomy		21
3	German (de) Klassische Dichotomie		11
4	French (fr) Dichotomie classique		6
5	Spanish (es) Dicotomía clásica		4
6	Persian (fa) دوگانگی کلاسیک		4
7	Japanese (ja) 古典派の二分法		4
8	Korean (ko) 고전학파의 이분법		2
9	Dutch (nl) Klassieke dichotomie		2
10	Azerbaijani (az) Klassik dixotomiya		1

More...

#	Language	Value
az	Azerbaijani Klassik dixotomiya
de	German Klassische Dichotomie
en	English Classical dichotomy
es	Spanish Dicotomía clásica
fa	Persian دوگانگی کلاسیک
fr	French Dichotomie classique
ja	Japanese 古典派の二分法
ko	Korean 고전학파의 이분법
nl	Dutch Klassieke dichotomie
pt	Portuguese Dicotomia clássica
sv	Swedish Klassiska dikotomin

Best Rank

Japanese: #206718 01.2021

Global: #278369 04.2013

Best Rank

Japanese: #28666 09.2015

Global: #74971 01.2006

On 11 June 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: UEFA Euro 2024, ChatGPT, 2026 FIFA World Cup qualification (AFC), Cristiano Ronaldo, YouTube, UEFA European Championship, deaths in 2024, Malawi, 2024 European Athletics Championships, Hunter Biden.

In Japanese Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: ホテルニュージャパン火災, 池脇千鶴, 横井英樹, 神戸蘭子, 三浦宏規, 磯山晶, 吉田羊, 武尊, 若葉竜也, 日本航空350便墜落事故.

The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from November, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from October 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information