Travel cost analysis

en

WikiRank.net
ver. 1.6.2

Travel cost analysis

Quality:

Article “Travel cost analysis” in English Wikipedia has 16.2 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 5 references and 3 sections. The article also contains templates indicating quality issues, therefore its score was reduced by 0.86 points.

This article has the best quality in Greek Wikipedia. However, this article is the most popular in English version.

Since the creation of article “Travel cost analysis”, its content was written by 23 registered users of English Wikipedia and edited by 46 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.

The article is cited 5 times in English Wikipedia and cited 14 times in all languages.

The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:

  • Local (English): #93395 in February 2006
  • Global: #189147 in February 2006

The highest popularity rank from 2008:

  • Local (English): #474936 in June 2019
  • Global: #766667 in June 2019

There are 6 language versions for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).

The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).

The table below shows the language versions of the article with the highest quality.

Languages with the highest quality

#LanguageQuality gradeQuality score
1Greek (el)
Ανάλυση κόστους ταξιδιού
34.4601
2English (en)
Travel cost analysis
16.2493
3Arabic (ar)
تحليل تكلفة السفر
14.5083
4Italian (it)
Metodo dei costi di viaggio
11.471
5Persian (fa)
ارزیابی بر اساس هزینه‌های سفر
6.5646
6Dutch (nl)
Reiskostenmethode
2.3445
More...

The following table shows the most popular language versions of the article.

Most popular in all the time

The most popular language versions of the article "Travel cost analysis" in all the time
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Travel cost analysis
115 774
2Italian (it)
Metodo dei costi di viaggio
16 259
3Dutch (nl)
Reiskostenmethode
4 404
4Greek (el)
Ανάλυση κόστους ταξιδιού
3 385
5Arabic (ar)
تحليل تكلفة السفر
719
6Persian (fa)
ارزیابی بر اساس هزینه‌های سفر
437
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest popularity in the last month.

Most popular in June 2025

The most popular language versions of the article "Travel cost analysis" in June 2025
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Travel cost analysis
388
2Italian (it)
Metodo dei costi di viaggio
46
3Greek (el)
Ανάλυση κόστους ταξιδιού
10
4Persian (fa)
ارزیابی بر اساس هزینه‌های سفر
7
5Dutch (nl)
Reiskostenmethode
6
6Arabic (ar)
تحليل تكلفة السفر
5
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest.

The highest AI

Language versions of the article "Travel cost analysis" with the highest Authors Interest (number of authors). Only registered Wikipedia users were taken into account.
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1English (en)
Travel cost analysis
23
2Italian (it)
Metodo dei costi di viaggio
9
3Greek (el)
Ανάλυση κόστους ταξιδιού
5
4Dutch (nl)
Reiskostenmethode
4
5Persian (fa)
ارزیابی بر اساس هزینه‌های سفر
3
6Arabic (ar)
تحليل تكلفة السفر
2
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest in the last month.

The highest AI in June 2025

Language versions of the article "Travel cost analysis" with the highest AI in June 2025
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1Arabic (ar)
تحليل تكلفة السفر
0
2Greek (el)
Ανάλυση κόστους ταξιδιού
0
3English (en)
Travel cost analysis
0
4Persian (fa)
ارزیابی بر اساس هزینه‌های سفر
0
5Italian (it)
Metodo dei costi di viaggio
0
6Dutch (nl)
Reiskostenmethode
0
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest number of citations.

The highest CI

Language versions of the article "Travel cost analysis" with the highest Citation Index (CI)
#LanguageCI awardRelative CI
1English (en)
Travel cost analysis
5
2Italian (it)
Metodo dei costi di viaggio
4
3Persian (fa)
ارزیابی بر اساس هزینه‌های سفر
3
4Dutch (nl)
Reiskostenmethode
2
5Arabic (ar)
تحليل تكلفة السفر
0
6Greek (el)
Ανάλυση κόστους ταξιδιού
0
More...

Scores

Estimated value for Wikipedia:
English:
Global:
Popularity in June 2025:
English:
Global:
Popularity in all years:
English:
Global:
Authors in June 2025:
English:
Global:
Registered authors in all years:
English:
Global:
Citations:
English:
Global:

Quality measures

Interwikis

#LanguageValue
arArabic
تحليل تكلفة السفر
elGreek
Ανάλυση κόστους ταξιδιού
enEnglish
Travel cost analysis
faPersian
ارزیابی بر اساس هزینه‌های سفر
itItalian
Metodo dei costi di viaggio
nlDutch
Reiskostenmethode

Popularity rank trends

Best Rank English:
#474936
06.2019
Global:
#766667
06.2019

AI rank trends

Best Rank English:
#93395
02.2006
Global:
#189147
02.2006

Languages comparison

Important global interconnections (July 2024 – June 2025)

Cumulative results of quality and popularity of the Wikipedia article

List of Wikipedia articles in different languages (starting with the most popular):

News from 10 February 2026

On 10 February 2026 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Ilia Malinin, Bad Bunny, 2026 Winter Olympics, Epstein files, Jutta Leerdam, Jake Paul, Puerto Rico, Little Saint James.

In English Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Bad Bunny, Jeffrey Epstein, Epstein files, Ilia Malinin, Savannah Guthrie, Ghislaine Maxwell, 2026 Winter Olympics, List of Super Bowl halftime shows, Eileen Gu, Jutta Leerdam.

About WikiRank

The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information