Final clause

en

WikiRank.net
ver. 1.6

Final clause

Quality:

Final clause - dependent adverbial clause expressing purpose. Article "Final clause" in English Wikipedia has 8.2 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 2 references and 2 sections. The article also contains quality flaw template, which reduce quality score.

This article has the best quality in German Wikipedia. However, this article is the most popular in English version.

Since the creation of article "Final clause", its content was written by 10 registered users of English Wikipedia and edited by 92 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.

The article is cited 7 times in English Wikipedia and cited 152 times in all languages.

The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:

  • Local (English): #63461 in February 2004
  • Global: #94945 in February 2004

The highest popularity rank from 2008:

  • Local (English): #1098260 in January 2014
  • Global: #215815 in September 2009

There are 5 language versions for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).

The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).

The table below shows the language versions of the article with the highest quality.

Languages with the highest quality

#LanguageQuality gradeQuality score
1German (de)
Finalsatz
24.844
2Polish (pl)
Okolicznik celu
14.0266
3English (en)
Final clause
8.1558
4Romanian (ro)
Propoziție circumstanțială de scop
2.1187
5Italian (it)
Proposizione finale
2.084
More...

The following table shows the most popular language versions of the article.

Most popular in all the time

The most popular language versions of the article "Final clause" in all the time
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1Italian (it)
Proposizione finale
241 567
2German (de)
Finalsatz
192 717
3Romanian (ro)
Propoziție circumstanțială de scop
79 043
4Polish (pl)
Okolicznik celu
71 626
5English (en)
Final clause
50 737
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest popularity in the last month.

Most popular in June 2025

The most popular language versions of the article "Final clause" in June 2025
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Final clause
229
2German (de)
Finalsatz
198
3Italian (it)
Proposizione finale
89
4Polish (pl)
Okolicznik celu
69
5Romanian (ro)
Propoziție circumstanțială de scop
48
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest.

The highest AI

Language versions of the article "Final clause" with the highest Authors Interest (number of authors). Only registered Wikipedia users were taken into account.
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1German (de)
Finalsatz
39
2Italian (it)
Proposizione finale
21
3Polish (pl)
Okolicznik celu
16
4English (en)
Final clause
10
5Romanian (ro)
Propoziție circumstanțială de scop
6
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest in the last month.

The highest AI in June 2025

Language versions of the article "Final clause" with the highest AI in June 2025
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1Italian (it)
Proposizione finale
1
2German (de)
Finalsatz
0
3English (en)
Final clause
0
4Polish (pl)
Okolicznik celu
0
5Romanian (ro)
Propoziție circumstanțială de scop
0
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest number of citations.

The highest CI

Language versions of the article "Final clause" with the highest Citation Index (CI)
#LanguageCI awardRelative CI
1Romanian (ro)
Propoziție circumstanțială de scop
76
2Italian (it)
Proposizione finale
40
3German (de)
Finalsatz
17
4Polish (pl)
Okolicznik celu
12
5English (en)
Final clause
7
More...

Scores

Estimated value for Wikipedia:
English:
Global:
Popularity in June 2025:
English:
Global:
Popularity in all years:
English:
Global:
Authors in June 2025:
English:
Global:
Registered authors in all years:
English:
Global:
Citations:
English:
Global:

Quality measures

Interwikis

#LanguageValue
deGerman
Finalsatz
enEnglish
Final clause
itItalian
Proposizione finale
plPolish
Okolicznik celu
roRomanian
Propoziție circumstanțială de scop

Popularity rank trends

Best Rank English:
#1098260
01.2014
Global:
#215815
09.2009

AI rank trends

Best Rank English:
#63461
02.2004
Global:
#94945
02.2004

Languages comparison

Important global interconnections (July 2024 – June 2025)

Wikipedia readers most often find their way to information on Final clause from Wikipedia articles about Supine, Purpose, Consecutive adverbial clause, Wikipedia article and Causal adverbial clause. Whereas reading the article about Final clause people most often go to Wikipedia articles on Adverbial clause, Wikipedia article, Wikipedia article, Dependent clause and Supine.

Cumulative results of quality and popularity of the Wikipedia article

List of Wikipedia articles in different languages (starting with the most popular):

News from 12 August 2025

On 12 August 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Cristiano Ronaldo, Wednesday, Georgina Rodríguez, ChatGPT, Weapons, Jenna Ortega, deaths in 2025, Taylor Swift, Miguel Uribe Turbay, 2025–26 UEFA Champions League.

In English Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Weapons (2025 film), Danielle Spencer (American actress), Cristiano Ronaldo, Deaths in 2025, Taylor Swift, Wednesday (TV series), Superman (2025 film), Georgina Rodríguez, Coolie (2025 film), The Fantastic Four: First Steps.

About WikiRank

The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information