Nullermænd

Quality:

Dust bunny - aggregation of particles. Article “Nullermænd” in Danish Wikipedia has 12 points for quality (as of July 1, 2026). The article contains 2 references and 2 sections.

This article has the best quality in German Wikipedia. Also, this article is the most popular in that (Danish) language version.

Since the creation of article “Nullermænd”, its content was written by 7 registered users of Danish Wikipedia and edited by 233 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.

The article is cited 3 times in Danish Wikipedia and cited 107 times in all languages.

The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:

• Local (Danish): #283 in July 2017
• Global: #2149 in February 2002

The highest popularity rank from 2008:

• Local (Danish): #7834 in July 2017
• Global: #148214 in March 2015

There are 11 language versions for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).

The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2026 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).

The table below shows the language versions of the article with the highest quality.

#	Language	Quality grade	Quality score
1	German (de) Hausstaub		41.5246
2	Chinese (zh) 尘兔		32.4595
3	Catalan (ca) Borra		27.5967
4	Dutch (nl) Huisstof		27.5728
5	Russian (ru) Комок пыли		26.964
6	Spanish (es) Borra		25.6315
7	Hungarian (hu) Porcica		23.2982
8	Arabic (ar) تكتلات الغبار		22.6819
9	Bulgarian (bg) Домашен прах		14.2415
10	Danish (da) Nullermænd		11.99

The following table shows the most popular language versions of the article.

#	Language	Popularity award	Relative popularity
1	German (de) Hausstaub		585 773
2	Spanish (es) Borra		95 991
3	Dutch (nl) Huisstof		74 583
4	Russian (ru) Комок пыли		42 963
5	Norwegian (no) Husstøv		39 634
6	Hungarian (hu) Porcica		20 465
7	Bulgarian (bg) Домашен прах		18 224
8	Chinese (zh) 尘兔		16 344
9	Danish (da) Nullermænd		5 770
10	Catalan (ca) Borra		2 887

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest popularity in the last month.

#	Language	Popularity award	Relative popularity
1	German (de) Hausstaub		706
2	Russian (ru) Комок пыли		636
3	Spanish (es) Borra		265
4	Chinese (zh) 尘兔		202
5	Dutch (nl) Huisstof		115
6	Hungarian (hu) Porcica		66
7	Norwegian (no) Husstøv		61
8	Bulgarian (bg) Домашен прах		55
9	Danish (da) Nullermænd		31
10	Catalan (ca) Borra		11

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest.

#	Language	AI award	Relative AI
1	German (de) Hausstaub		116
2	Dutch (nl) Huisstof		20
3	Hungarian (hu) Porcica		19
4	Norwegian (no) Husstøv		19
5	Spanish (es) Borra		18
6	Russian (ru) Комок пыли		18
7	Danish (da) Nullermænd		7
8	Chinese (zh) 尘兔		6
9	Arabic (ar) تكتلات الغبار		5
10	Bulgarian (bg) Домашен прах		3

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest in the last month.

#	Language	AI award	Relative AI
1	German (de) Hausstaub		1
2	Chinese (zh) 尘兔		1
3	Arabic (ar) تكتلات الغبار		0
4	Bulgarian (bg) Домашен прах		0
5	Catalan (ca) Borra		0
6	Danish (da) Nullermænd		0
7	Spanish (es) Borra		0
8	Hungarian (hu) Porcica		0
9	Dutch (nl) Huisstof		0
10	Norwegian (no) Husstøv		0

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest number of citations.

On 1 July 2026 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: 2026 FIFA World Cup, Kylian Mbappé, Erling Haaland, Democratic Republic of the Congo, FIFA World Cup, Harry Kane, Romelu Lukaku, Senegal, Michael Olise, Sadio Mané.

In Danish Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Egeprocessionsspinder, Demokratiske Republik Congo, Senegal, Harry Kane, Erling Haaland, Sadio Mané, Novak Djokovic, Tour de France 2026, The Cure, Jesper Grønkjær.

The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 50 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2026. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2026 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2026... More information