Trae (IDE) - Trae is an AI IDE made by Bytedance. This software is the 9665th most popular in the global Wikipedia ranking of software. Article “Trae” in Chinese Wikipedia has 37.6 points for quality (as of July 1, 2026). The article contains 18 references and 5 sections.
Since the creation of article “Trae”, its content was written by 7 registered users of Chinese Wikipedia and edited by 7 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
Trae (IDE) is on the 9665th place in global ranking of software on Wikipedia in all the time.
The article is cited 2 times in Chinese Wikipedia and cited 2 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2026 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Chinese: #59771 05.2026 |
Global: #1148110 05.2026 |
On 1 July 2026 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: 2026 FIFA World Cup, Kylian Mbappé, Erling Haaland, Democratic Republic of the Congo, FIFA World Cup, Harry Kane, Romelu Lukaku, Senegal, Michael Olise, Sadio Mané.
In Chinese Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: 2026年國際足協世界盃, 金特務：本色回歸, 欠妳的那場婚禮, 非份之罪, 鐵拳教育, 埃尔林·哈兰德, 给阿嬷的情书, 郭文贵, 刚果民主共和国, 楊珍妮.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 50 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2026. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2026 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2026... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(12.07+17.82+16.67+41.67+100)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
