Article “IVI” in Chinese Wikipedia has 26 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 4 references and 11 sections. The article also contains templates indicating quality issues, therefore its score was reduced by 1.37 points.
Since the creation of article “IVI”, its content was written by 27 registered users of Chinese Wikipedia and edited by 27 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 94 times in Chinese Wikipedia and cited 94 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Chinese: #1551 01.2021 |
Global: #102007 02.2021 |
| Best Rank | Chinese: #2992 05.2021 |
Global: #195670 07.2018 |
On 28 January 2026 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: 2025–26 UEFA Champions League, Nipah virus, Doomsday Clock, UEFA Champions League, Elena Rybakina, Donald Trump, 2026 European Men's Handball Championship, killing of Alex Pretti, Kristi Noem, deaths in 2026.
In Chinese Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: 张又侠, 陽光女子合唱團, 篠崎泫, 愛情怎麼翻譯？, 賈永婕, 劉偉健, 习近平, 超時空輝耀姬！, 艾力克斯·霍諾德, 名媛望族.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(16.36+3.96+0+91.67+24.77)-1.37$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
