節儉悖論 → 節儉矛盾

Quality:

Paradox of thrift - economic paradox that an increase in autonomous saving decreases aggregate demand and thus gross output, which will in turn lower total saving. Article "節儉矛盾" in Chinese Wikipedia has 32.6 points for quality (as of November 1, 2023). The article contains 7 references and 8 sections.

This article has the best quality in Persian Wikipedia. However, the most popular language version of this article is English.

Since the creation of article "節儉矛盾", its content was written by 14 registered users of Chinese Wikipedia and edited by 321 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.

The article is cited 21 times in Chinese Wikipedia and cited 482 times in all languages.

The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:

  • Local (Chinese): #3310 in March 2011
  • Global: #49763 in March 2011

The highest popularity rank from 2008:

  • Local (Chinese): #10038 in March 2011
  • Global: #54506 in June 2013

There are 21 language versions for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).

The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from November 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).

下表顯示了最高品質的文章的語言版本。

Languages with the highest quality

#LanguageQuality gradeQuality score
1Persian (fa)
تناقض خست
38.9196
2English (en)
Paradox of thrift
34.1427
3Chinese (zh)
節儉矛盾
32.5818
4Ukrainian (uk)
Парадокс заощаджень
31.2418
5German (de)
Sparparadoxon
30.7878
6Lithuanian (lt)
Taupumo paradoksas
28.7091
7French (fr)
Paradoxe de l'épargne
24.5235
8Armenian (hy)
Խնայողության պարադոքս
23.7945
9Portuguese (pt)
Paradoxo da parcimônia
22.7527
10Azerbaijani (az)
Qənaətcillik paradoksu
19.5323
More...

The following table shows the most popular language versions of the article.

Most popular in all the time

The most popular language versions of the article "節儉矛盾" in all the time
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Paradox of thrift
1 152 352
2Spanish (es)
Paradoja del ahorro
264 727
3Russian (ru)
Парадокс бережливости
200 275
4German (de)
Sparparadoxon
136 326
5Polish (pl)
Paradoks zapobiegliwości
102 791
6Chinese (zh)
節儉矛盾
70 505
7Italian (it)
Paradosso della parsimonia
30 871
8French (fr)
Paradoxe de l'épargne
23 515
9Hebrew (he)
פרדוקס החיסכון
19 131
10Ukrainian (uk)
Парадокс заощаджень
18 412
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest popularity in the last month.

Most popular in October 2023

The most popular language versions of the article "節儉矛盾" in October 2023
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Paradox of thrift
2 761
2Spanish (es)
Paradoja del ahorro
623
3Russian (ru)
Парадокс бережливости
498
4Chinese (zh)
節儉矛盾
445
5French (fr)
Paradoxe de l'épargne
202
6Persian (fa)
تناقض خست
190
7Italian (it)
Paradosso della parsimonia
190
8German (de)
Sparparadoxon
174
9Polish (pl)
Paradoks zapobiegliwości
105
10Korean (ko)
절약의 역설
100
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest.

The highest AI

Language versions of the article "節儉矛盾" with the highest Authors Interest (number of authors). Only registered Wikipedia users were taken into account.
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1English (en)
Paradox of thrift
116
2German (de)
Sparparadoxon
42
3Russian (ru)
Парадокс бережливости
31
4Hebrew (he)
פרדוקס החיסכון
19
5Chinese (zh)
節儉矛盾
14
6Spanish (es)
Paradoja del ahorro
13
7Italian (it)
Paradosso della parsimonia
13
8Ukrainian (uk)
Парадокс заощаджень
12
9Polish (pl)
Paradoks zapobiegliwości
9
10French (fr)
Paradoxe de l'épargne
8
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest in the last month.

The highest AI in October 2023

Language versions of the article "節儉矛盾" with the highest AI in October 2023
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1English (en)
Paradox of thrift
1
2Russian (ru)
Парадокс бережливости
1
3Slovak (sk)
Paradox sporivosti
1
4Arabic (ar)
مفارقة الادخار
0
5Azerbaijani (az)
Qənaətcillik paradoksu
0
6Catalan (ca)
Paradoxa de l'estalvi
0
7German (de)
Sparparadoxon
0
8Spanish (es)
Paradoja del ahorro
0
9Persian (fa)
تناقض خست
0
10French (fr)
Paradoxe de l'épargne
0
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest number of citations.

The highest CI

Language versions of the article "節儉矛盾" with the highest Citation Index (CI)
#LanguageCI awardRelative CI
1English (en)
Paradox of thrift
134
2Ukrainian (uk)
Парадокс заощаджень
115
3Armenian (hy)
Խնայողության պարադոքս
49
4Arabic (ar)
مفارقة الادخار
41
5Persian (fa)
تناقض خست
40
6German (de)
Sparparadoxon
24
7Chinese (zh)
節儉矛盾
21
8Russian (ru)
Парадокс бережливости
18
9Simple English (simple)
Paradox of thrift
9
10Spanish (es)
Paradoja del ahorro
8
More...

Scores

Estimated value for Wikipedia:
Chinese:
Global:
Popularity in October 2023:
Chinese:
Global:
Popularity in all years:
Chinese:
Global:
Authors in October 2023:
Chinese:
Global:
Registered authors in all years:
Chinese:
Global:
Citations:
Chinese:
Global:

Quality measures

Interwikis

#LanguageValue
arArabic
مفارقة الادخار
azAzerbaijani
Qənaətcillik paradoksu
caCatalan
Paradoxa de l'estalvi
deGerman
Sparparadoxon
enEnglish
Paradox of thrift
esSpanish
Paradoja del ahorro
faPersian
تناقض خست
frFrench
Paradoxe de l'épargne
heHebrew
פרדוקס החיסכון
hyArmenian
Խնայողության պարադոքս
itItalian
Paradosso della parsimonia
koKorean
절약의 역설
ltLithuanian
Taupumo paradoksas
nlDutch
Besparingsparadox
plPolish
Paradoks zapobiegliwości
ptPortuguese
Paradoxo da parcimônia
ruRussian
Парадокс бережливости
simpleSimple English
Paradox of thrift
skSlovak
Paradox sporivosti
ukUkrainian
Парадокс заощаджень
zhChinese
節儉矛盾

Popularity rank trends

Best Rank Chinese:
#10038
03.2011
Global:
#54506
06.2013

AI rank trends

Best Rank Chinese:
#3310
03.2011
Global:
#49763
03.2011

Local AI rank history

Languages comparison

Important global interconnections

Wikipedia readers most often find their way to information on Paradox of thrift from Wikipedia articles about Fallacy of composition, The Fable of the Bees, Keynesian economics, Frugality and Paradox of toil. Whereas reading the article about Paradox of thrift people most often go to Wikipedia articles on The Fable of the Bees, Fallacy of composition, Aggregate demand, Prisoners dilemma and John Maynard Keynes.

Cumulative results of quality and popularity of the Wikipedia article

List of Wikipedia articles in different languages (starting with the most popular):

News from 23 April 2024

On 23 April 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: YouTube, Serie A, Shōgun, Fallout, Facebook, Fallout, Saint George, Saint George Day, Inter Milan, ChatGPT.

In Chinese Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: 淚之女王, 921大地震, 不夠善良的我們, 許美靜, 逆天奇案2, 金智媛, 2024年花蓮地震, 背着善宰跑, 破墓, 金秀賢 (男演員).

About WikiRank

The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from November, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from October 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information