投票悖论

zh

WikiRank.net
ver. 1.6

投票悖论

Quality:

Voting paradox (Condorcet) - Marquis de Condorcet's observation regarding times when voters' collective preferences are cyclic, even when voters' individual preferences are not. Article "投票悖论" in Chinese Wikipedia has 3.6 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 0 references and 2 sections. The article also contains quality flaw template, which reduce quality score.

This article has the best quality in English Wikipedia. Also, this article is the most popular in that language version.

Since the creation of article "投票悖论", its content was written by 13 registered users of Chinese Wikipedia and edited by 591 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.

The article is cited 68 times in Chinese Wikipedia and cited 882 times in all languages.

The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:

  • Local (Chinese): #1198 in November 2012
  • Global: #432 in March 2002

The highest popularity rank from 2008:

  • Local (Chinese): #96513 in April 2019
  • Global: #59230 in January 2011

There are 25 language versions for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).

The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).

The table below shows the language versions of the article with the highest quality.

Languages with the highest quality

#LanguageQuality gradeQuality score
1English (en)
Condorcet paradox
52.9968
2Portuguese (pt)
Paradoxo de Condorcet
19.6159
3Russian (ru)
Парадокс Кондорсе
16.7296
4Italian (it)
Paradosso di Condorcet
16.5538
5Turkish (tr)
Seçim paradoksu
16.4475
6Korean (ko)
투표의 역설
15.4786
7German (de)
Condorcet-Paradoxon
14.4859
8French (fr)
Paradoxe de Condorcet
14.3757
9Armenian (hy)
Կոնդորսեի պարադոքս
12.9449
10Catalan (ca)
Paradoxa de Condorcet
12.1595
More...

The following table shows the most popular language versions of the article.

Most popular in all the time

The most popular language versions of the article "投票悖论" in all the time
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Condorcet paradox
871 669
2French (fr)
Paradoxe de Condorcet
416 813
3Russian (ru)
Парадокс Кондорсе
315 455
4Japanese (ja)
投票の逆理
250 316
5Italian (it)
Paradosso di Condorcet
210 905
6German (de)
Condorcet-Paradoxon
191 229
7Polish (pl)
Paradoks głosowania
162 456
8Spanish (es)
Paradoja de Condorcet
110 228
9Chinese (zh)
投票悖论
49 674
10Portuguese (pt)
Paradoxo de Condorcet
42 402
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest popularity in the last month.

Most popular in June 2025

The most popular language versions of the article "投票悖论" in June 2025
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Condorcet paradox
6 080
2French (fr)
Paradoxe de Condorcet
1 107
3Russian (ru)
Парадокс Кондорсе
696
4Japanese (ja)
投票の逆理
695
5German (de)
Condorcet-Paradoxon
494
6Italian (it)
Paradosso di Condorcet
489
7Chinese (zh)
投票悖论
295
8Spanish (es)
Paradoja de Condorcet
251
9Polish (pl)
Paradoks głosowania
191
10Korean (ko)
투표의 역설
117
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest.

The highest AI

Language versions of the article "投票悖论" with the highest Authors Interest (number of authors). Only registered Wikipedia users were taken into account.
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1English (en)
Condorcet paradox
114
2French (fr)
Paradoxe de Condorcet
82
3German (de)
Condorcet-Paradoxon
62
4Italian (it)
Paradosso di Condorcet
54
5Spanish (es)
Paradoja de Condorcet
46
6Russian (ru)
Парадокс Кондорсе
37
7Hebrew (he)
פרדוקס ההצבעה
23
8Japanese (ja)
投票の逆理
22
9Polish (pl)
Paradoks głosowania
22
10Hungarian (hu)
Szavazási paradoxon
20
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest in the last month.

The highest AI in June 2025

Language versions of the article "投票悖论" with the highest AI in June 2025
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1English (en)
Condorcet paradox
2
2Italian (it)
Paradosso di Condorcet
1
3Catalan (ca)
Paradoxa de Condorcet
0
4German (de)
Condorcet-Paradoxon
0
5Esperanto (eo)
Balotada paradokso
0
6Spanish (es)
Paradoja de Condorcet
0
7Persian (fa)
پارادوکس کندورسه
0
8Finnish (fi)
Condorcet’n paradoksi
0
9French (fr)
Paradoxe de Condorcet
0
10Galician (gl)
Paradoxo de Condorcet
0
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest number of citations.

The highest CI

Language versions of the article "投票悖论" with the highest Citation Index (CI)
#LanguageCI awardRelative CI
1English (en)
Condorcet paradox
348
2Russian (ru)
Парадокс Кондорсе
108
3Chinese (zh)
投票悖论
68
4Armenian (hy)
Կոնդորսեի պարադոքս
51
5French (fr)
Paradoxe de Condorcet
45
6Persian (fa)
پارادوکس کندورسه
44
7Japanese (ja)
投票の逆理
44
8Italian (it)
Paradosso di Condorcet
30
9German (de)
Condorcet-Paradoxon
25
10Spanish (es)
Paradoja de Condorcet
16
More...

Scores

Estimated value for Wikipedia:
Chinese:
Global:
Popularity in June 2025:
Chinese:
Global:
Popularity in all years:
Chinese:
Global:
Authors in June 2025:
Chinese:
Global:
Registered authors in all years:
Chinese:
Global:
Citations:
Chinese:
Global:

Quality measures

Interwikis

#LanguageValue
caCatalan
Paradoxa de Condorcet
deGerman
Condorcet-Paradoxon
enEnglish
Condorcet paradox
eoEsperanto
Balotada paradokso
esSpanish
Paradoja de Condorcet
faPersian
پارادوکس کندورسه
fiFinnish
Condorcet’n paradoksi
frFrench
Paradoxe de Condorcet
glGalician
Paradoxo de Condorcet
heHebrew
פרדוקס ההצבעה
huHungarian
Szavazási paradoxon
hyArmenian
Կոնդորսեի պարադոքս
itItalian
Paradosso di Condorcet
jaJapanese
投票の逆理
koKorean
투표의 역설
ltLithuanian
Balsavimo paradoksas
nlDutch
Paradox van Condorcet
plPolish
Paradoks głosowania
ptPortuguese
Paradoxo de Condorcet
roRomanian
Paradoxul lui Condorcet
ruRussian
Парадокс Кондорсе
svSwedish
Condorcetparadoxen
trTurkish
Seçim paradoksu
ukUkrainian
Парадокс Кондорсе
zhChinese
投票悖论

Popularity rank trends

Best Rank Chinese:
#96513
04.2019
Global:
#59230
01.2011

AI rank trends

Best Rank Chinese:
#1198
11.2012
Global:
#432
03.2002

Local AI rank history

Global AI rank history

Languages comparison

Important global interconnections (July 2024 – June 2025)

Wikipedia readers most often find their way to information on Voting paradox (Condorcet) from Wikipedia articles about Arrows impossibility theorem, Paradox, Jean-Antoine-Nicolas de Caritat de Condorcet, Condorcet method and Design by committee. Whereas reading the article about Voting paradox (Condorcet) people most often go to Wikipedia articles on Arrows impossibility theorem, Jean-Antoine-Nicolas de Caritat de Condorcet, Condorcet method, Spoiler effect and Schulze method.

Cumulative results of quality and popularity of the Wikipedia article

List of Wikipedia articles in different languages (starting with the most popular):

News from 12 August 2025

On 12 August 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Cristiano Ronaldo, Wednesday, Georgina Rodríguez, ChatGPT, Weapons, Jenna Ortega, deaths in 2025, Taylor Swift, Miguel Uribe Turbay, 2025–26 UEFA Champions League.

In Chinese Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: 朱由𣜬, 林岱樺, 林逸欣, 江油未成年人欺凌事件, 鬼滅之刃, 黃士修, 鬼滅之刃角色列表, 锦月如歌, 2025年亞洲盃籃球賽, 鬼滅之刃劇場版 無限城篇.

About WikiRank

The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information