基本比率謬誤

zh

WikiRank.net
ver. 1.6

基本比率謬誤

Quality:

Base rate fallacy - error in thinking which involves under-valuing base rate information. Article "基本比率謬誤" in Chinese Wikipedia has 6.1 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 0 references and 3 sections.

This article has the best quality in English Wikipedia. Also, this article is the most popular in that language version.

Since the creation of article "基本比率謬誤", its content was written by 5 registered users of Chinese Wikipedia and edited by 585 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.

The article is cited 228 times in Chinese Wikipedia and cited 1205 times in all languages.

The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:

  • Local (Chinese): #44696 in April 2014
  • Global: #2166 in October 2002

The highest popularity rank from 2008:

  • Local (Chinese): #43134 in November 2016
  • Global: #34332 in August 2015

There are 16 language versions for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).

The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).

The table below shows the language versions of the article with the highest quality.

Languages with the highest quality

#LanguageQuality gradeQuality score
1English (en)
Base rate fallacy
61.9345
2Portuguese (pt)
Falácia da taxa-base
51.8127
3Turkish (tr)
Temel oran safsatası
41.044
4Ukrainian (uk)
Омана базового відсотка
35.8121
5Thai (th)
เหตุผลวิบัติโดยอัตราพื้นฐาน
32.6068
6Italian (it)
Fallacia del tasso di base
27.4584
7Spanish (es)
Falacia de la frecuencia base
25.7487
8Korean (ko)
기저율 오류
24.4347
9German (de)
Prävalenzfehler
21.9785
10Arabic (ar)
مغالطة معدل الأساس
20.2585
More...

The following table shows the most popular language versions of the article.

Most popular in all the time

The most popular language versions of the article "基本比率謬誤" in all the time
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Base rate fallacy
2 989 087
2French (fr)
Oubli de la fréquence de base
142 051
3German (de)
Prävalenzfehler
113 732
4Chinese (zh)
基本比率謬誤
57 179
5Russian (ru)
Ошибка базового процента
52 758
6Polish (pl)
Zaniedbywanie miarodajności
22 809
7Spanish (es)
Falacia de la frecuencia base
20 541
8Hebrew (he)
כשל הסתברות קודמת
13 315
9Italian (it)
Fallacia del tasso di base
8 435
10Ukrainian (uk)
Омана базового відсотка
7 428
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest popularity in the last month.

Most popular in June 2025

The most popular language versions of the article "基本比率謬誤" in June 2025
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Base rate fallacy
11 503
2French (fr)
Oubli de la fréquence de base
579
3German (de)
Prävalenzfehler
302
4Russian (ru)
Ошибка базового процента
220
5Chinese (zh)
基本比率謬誤
183
6Korean (ko)
기저율 오류
182
7Spanish (es)
Falacia de la frecuencia base
151
8Polish (pl)
Zaniedbywanie miarodajności
130
9Italian (it)
Fallacia del tasso di base
124
10Ukrainian (uk)
Омана базового відсотка
68
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest.

The highest AI

Language versions of the article "基本比率謬誤" with the highest Authors Interest (number of authors). Only registered Wikipedia users were taken into account.
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1English (en)
Base rate fallacy
350
2German (de)
Prävalenzfehler
72
3French (fr)
Oubli de la fréquence de base
60
4Italian (it)
Fallacia del tasso di base
17
5Hebrew (he)
כשל הסתברות קודמת
13
6Russian (ru)
Ошибка базового процента
13
7Spanish (es)
Falacia de la frecuencia base
12
8Polish (pl)
Zaniedbywanie miarodajności
10
9Turkish (tr)
Temel oran safsatası
8
10Ukrainian (uk)
Омана базового відсотка
8
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest in the last month.

The highest AI in June 2025

Language versions of the article "基本比率謬誤" with the highest AI in June 2025
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1English (en)
Base rate fallacy
1
2Italian (it)
Fallacia del tasso di base
1
3Arabic (ar)
مغالطة معدل الأساس
0
4German (de)
Prävalenzfehler
0
5Spanish (es)
Falacia de la frecuencia base
0
6Persian (fa)
غفلت از نرخ پایه
0
7French (fr)
Oubli de la fréquence de base
0
8Hebrew (he)
כשל הסתברות קודמת
0
9Korean (ko)
기저율 오류
0
10Polish (pl)
Zaniedbywanie miarodajności
0
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest number of citations.

The highest CI

Language versions of the article "基本比率謬誤" with the highest Citation Index (CI)
#LanguageCI awardRelative CI
1English (en)
Base rate fallacy
326
2Chinese (zh)
基本比率謬誤
228
3Arabic (ar)
مغالطة معدل الأساس
149
4Ukrainian (uk)
Омана базового відсотка
142
5French (fr)
Oubli de la fréquence de base
140
6Persian (fa)
غفلت از نرخ پایه
73
7Hebrew (he)
כשל הסתברות קודמת
49
8Thai (th)
เหตุผลวิบัติโดยอัตราพื้นฐาน
40
9Turkish (tr)
Temel oran safsatası
15
10Korean (ko)
기저율 오류
12
More...

Scores

Estimated value for Wikipedia:
Chinese:
Global:
Popularity in June 2025:
Chinese:
Global:
Popularity in all years:
Chinese:
Global:
Authors in June 2025:
Chinese:
Global:
Registered authors in all years:
Chinese:
Global:
Citations:
Chinese:
Global:

Quality measures

Interwikis

#LanguageValue
arArabic
مغالطة معدل الأساس
deGerman
Prävalenzfehler
enEnglish
Base rate fallacy
esSpanish
Falacia de la frecuencia base
faPersian
غفلت از نرخ پایه
frFrench
Oubli de la fréquence de base
heHebrew
כשל הסתברות קודמת
itItalian
Fallacia del tasso di base
koKorean
기저율 오류
plPolish
Zaniedbywanie miarodajności
ptPortuguese
Falácia da taxa-base
ruRussian
Ошибка базового процента
thThai
เหตุผลวิบัติโดยอัตราพื้นฐาน
trTurkish
Temel oran safsatası
ukUkrainian
Омана базового відсотка
zhChinese
基本比率謬誤

Popularity rank trends

Best Rank Chinese:
#43134
11.2016
Global:
#34332
08.2015

AI rank trends

Best Rank Chinese:
#44696
04.2014
Global:
#2166
10.2002

Global AI rank history

Languages comparison

Important global interconnections (July 2024 – June 2025)

Wikipedia readers most often find their way to information on Base rate fallacy from Wikipedia articles about Bayes theorem, List of fallacies, Likelihood function, Lucy Letby and Sophism. Whereas reading the article about Base rate fallacy people most often go to Wikipedia articles on Extension neglect, Bayes theorem, Base rate, Sally Clark and List of cognitive biases.

Cumulative results of quality and popularity of the Wikipedia article

List of Wikipedia articles in different languages (starting with the most popular):

News from 12 August 2025

On 12 August 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Cristiano Ronaldo, Wednesday, Georgina Rodríguez, ChatGPT, Weapons, Jenna Ortega, deaths in 2025, Taylor Swift, Miguel Uribe Turbay, 2025–26 UEFA Champions League.

In Chinese Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: 朱由𣜬, 林岱樺, 林逸欣, 江油未成年人欺凌事件, 鬼滅之刃, 黃士修, 鬼滅之刃角色列表, 锦月如歌, 2025年亞洲盃籃球賽, 鬼滅之刃劇場版 無限城篇.

About WikiRank

The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information