Beijing–Shanghai second high-speed railway - railway line in People's Republic of China. Article "京沪高铁第二通道" in Chinese Wikipedia has 28.5 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article contains 6 references and 10 sections.
Since the creation of article "京沪高铁第二通道", its content was written by 14 registered users of Chinese Wikipedia and edited by 14 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 302 times in Chinese Wikipedia and cited 302 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Chinese: #78353 10.2019 |
Global: #1483636 12.2023 |
| Best Rank | Chinese: #2074 10.2016 |
Global: #161779 10.2016 |
On 3 November 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: 2024 United States presidential election, Kamala Harris, Donald Trump, 2024 Formula One World Championship, The Substance, Kemi Badenoch, deaths in 2024, Elon Musk, Venom: The Last Dance, Max Verstappen.
In Chinese Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Faker, 来自地狱的法官, 2024年美國總統選舉, 英雄联盟全球总决赛, 永夜星河, T1 (電競隊伍), 劉德華, 焚城, BLG电子竞技俱乐部, 杜琪峯.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(17.35+6.06+0+83.33+35.51)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
