Article "Phan Trọng Chinh" in Vietnamese Wikipedia has 22.9 points for quality (as of November 1, 2023). The article contains 14 references and 7 sections.
Since the creation of article "Phan Trọng Chinh", its content was written by 16 registered users of Vietnamese Wikipedia and edited by 16 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 24 times in Vietnamese Wikipedia and cited 24 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from November 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Vietnamese: #10570 04.2015 |
Global: #1385670 06.2017 |
On 25 June 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: UEFA Euro 2024, Julian Assange, UEFA European Championship, UEFA Euro 2020, Shifty Shellshock, 2024 Copa América, WikiLeaks, YouTube, Inside Out 2, House of the Dragon.
In Vietnamese Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Giải vô địch bóng đá châu Âu 2024, Đài Truyền hình Kỹ thuật số VTC, Nguyễn Thị Tuyến, Giải vô địch bóng đá châu Âu, Ban Nội chính Trung ương Đảng Cộng sản Việt Nam, Bảng xếp hạng bóng đá nam FIFA, Châu Bùi, Cleopatra VII, Cúp bóng đá Nam Mỹ, Thích Chân Quang.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from November, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from October 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(18.03+8.38+8.33+35+44.85)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
