Article "Nhân Khang" in Vietnamese Wikipedia has 13.8 points for quality (as of November 1, 2023). The article contains 1 references and 3 sections.
Since the creation of article "Nhân Khang", its content was written by 9 registered users of Vietnamese Wikipedia and edited by 9 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 28 times in Vietnamese Wikipedia and cited 28 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from November 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Vietnamese: #38390 08.2010 |
Global: #5613361 04.2021 |
| Best Rank | Vietnamese: #7147 12.2014 |
Global: #927290 08.2010 |
On 28 April 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: YouTube, Fallout, Facebook, Baby Reindeer, Challengers, Premier League, Fallout, deaths in 2024, Queen of Tears, Arsenal F.C..
In Vietnamese Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Đài Truyền hình Kỹ thuật số VTC, Vương Đình Huệ, Chiến dịch Điện Biên Phủ, Trần Thanh Mẫn, Lật mặt 7: Một điều ước, Phan Thị Mỹ Thanh, Chủ tịch nước Cộng hòa xã hội chủ nghĩa Việt Nam, Tô Lâm, Đài Truyền hình Việt Nam, VnExpress.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from November, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from October 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(1.32+0.6+8.33+15+43.88)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
