Article "Nam Giang (thị trấn)" in Vietnamese Wikipedia has 23.3 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article contains 4 references and 6 sections.
Since the creation of article "Nam Giang (thị trấn)", its content was written by 18 registered users of Vietnamese Wikipedia and edited by 18 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 31 times in Vietnamese Wikipedia and cited 31 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Vietnamese: #11053 02.2014 |
Global: #1685808 02.2014 |
On 20 December 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Magdeburg, Mufasa: The Lion King, Elon Musk, Mazan rape case, Gisèle Pelicot, Superman, Ayrton Senna, Isack Hadjar, deaths in 2024, David Corenswet.
In Vietnamese Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Đài Truyền hình Kỹ thuật số VTC, Rafaelson, XVideos, Việt Nam, Văn Miếu – Quốc Tử Giám, Quân đội nhân dân Việt Nam, Giải vô địch bóng đá ASEAN 2024, Bảng xếp hạng bóng đá nam FIFA, Triển lãm Quốc phòng quốc tế Việt Nam 2024, Khi điện thoại đổ chuông.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(3.15+2.3+9.09+30+71.78)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
