Article "Mưa lũ miền Bắc Việt Nam 2015" in Vietnamese Wikipedia has 48.7 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 32 references and 22 sections.
Since the creation of article "Mưa lũ miền Bắc Việt Nam 2015", its content was written by 11 registered users of Vietnamese Wikipedia and edited by 11 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 79 times in Vietnamese Wikipedia and cited 79 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Vietnamese: #9217 08.2015 |
Global: #1248507 09.2024 |
On 12 August 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Cristiano Ronaldo, Wednesday, Georgina Rodríguez, ChatGPT, Weapons, Jenna Ortega, deaths in 2025, Taylor Swift, Miguel Uribe Turbay, 2025–26 UEFA Champions League.
In Vietnamese Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Đài Truyền hình Kỹ thuật số VTC, Gà lôi trắng, Danh mục sách đỏ động vật Việt Nam, Lê Thanh Hải (chính khách), XNXX, Nguyễn Thị Bình, Nguyễn Thị Bích Tuyền, "Anh trai \"say hi\" (mùa 1)", Anh trai "say hi" (mùa 1), Tô Lâm.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(16.09+18.08+9.09+100+100)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
