Article "Hạn hán miền Nam Việt Nam 2016" in Vietnamese Wikipedia has 28.2 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 20 references and 8 sections.
Since the creation of article "Hạn hán miền Nam Việt Nam 2016", its content was written by 16 registered users of Vietnamese Wikipedia and edited by 16 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 77 times in Vietnamese Wikipedia and cited 77 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Vietnamese: #2949 04.2016 |
Global: #594665 04.2016 |
On 12 August 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Cristiano Ronaldo, Wednesday, Georgina Rodríguez, ChatGPT, Weapons, Jenna Ortega, deaths in 2025, Taylor Swift, Miguel Uribe Turbay, 2025–26 UEFA Champions League.
In Vietnamese Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Đài Truyền hình Kỹ thuật số VTC, Gà lôi trắng, Danh mục sách đỏ động vật Việt Nam, Lê Thanh Hải (chính khách), XNXX, Nguyễn Thị Bình, Nguyễn Thị Bích Tuyền, "Anh trai \"say hi\" (mùa 1)", Anh trai "say hi" (mùa 1), Tô Lâm.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(17.39+11.3+9.09+40+63.13)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
