Article "Giảng Võ" in Vietnamese Wikipedia has 26.6 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article contains 5 references and 2 sections.
Since the creation of article "Giảng Võ", its content was written by 11 registered users of Vietnamese Wikipedia and edited by 11 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 51 times in Vietnamese Wikipedia and cited 51 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Vietnamese: #16408 11.2022 |
Global: #1578878 11.2022 |
| Best Rank | Vietnamese: #4937 12.2020 |
Global: #1221045 12.2020 |
On 12 November 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Donald Trump, Marco Rubio, Elon Musk, Song Jae-lim, 2024 United States presidential election, Megan Fox, Melania Trump, Gladiator II, ChatGPT, deaths in 2024.
In Vietnamese Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Hoa hậu Quốc tế 2024, Thanh Thủy (hoa hậu), Hoa hậu Quốc tế, Danh sách cuộc thi sắc đẹp, Đài Truyền hình Kỹ thuật số VTC, Phạm Gia Túc, Song Jae-rim, Lê Nguyễn Bảo Ngọc, Hoa hậu Việt Nam 2022, Bitcoin.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(2.1+2.87+18.18+10+100)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
