Article "سید احمد جیلانی" in Urdu Wikipedia has 0.9 points for quality (as of November 1, 2023). The article also contains quality flaw template, which reduce quality score.
Since the creation of article "سید احمد جیلانی", its content was written by 1 registered users of Urdu Wikipedia and edited by 1 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 1 times in Urdu Wikipedia and cited 1 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from November 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Urdu: #11339 12.2018 |
Global: #7804339 12.2018 |
| Best Rank | Urdu: #4055 12.2018 |
Global: #901851 12.2018 |
On 22 May 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Ademola Lookman, Atalanta BC, Toni Kroos, Gian Piero Gasperini, Bayer 04 Leverkusen, international recognition of the State of Palestine, UEFA Europa League, Ebrahim Raisi, State of Palestine, YouTube.
In Urdu Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: انا لله و انا الیه راجعون, ابراہیم رئیسی, محمد بن عبد اللہ, سید احمد خان, سید علی خامنہ ای, عمر بن خطاب, ابراہیم (اسلام), محمد اقبال, پاکستان, یوم تکبیر.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from November, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from October 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(1.1+0+0+3.57+0)-0.05$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
