Scaevola procera - species of plant. Article “Scaevola procera” in Swedish Wikipedia has 22.9 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 4 references and 1 sections.
Since the creation of article “Scaevola procera”, its content was written by 2 registered users of Swedish Wikipedia and edited by 2 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 3 times in Swedish Wikipedia and cited 3 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Swedish: #474581 02.2020 |
Global: #10406800 12.2014 |
| Best Rank | Swedish: #6175 02.2020 |
Global: #987245 02.2020 |
On 10 March 2026 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Iran, Mojtaba Khamenei, Enhypen, Ali Khamenei, Strait of Hormuz, Jeffrey Epstein, 2026 Iran war, 2026 World Baseball Classic, Donald Trump, World Baseball Classic.
In Swedish Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Ebba Årsjö, Felicia Eriksson, Thomas Sjögren (krögare), Zebastian Modin, Christer A, Melodifestivalen 2026, Tomas Sjödin, Anders Wall, Jeffrey Epstein, Hormuzsundet.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(4.25+4.08+8.33+5.26+92.42)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
