Article "Paul Schröderstierna" in Swedish Wikipedia has 10.3 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article contains 1 references and 4 sections.
Since the creation of article "Paul Schröderstierna", its content was written by 6 registered users of Swedish Wikipedia and edited by 6 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 4 times in Swedish Wikipedia and cited 4 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Swedish: #251718 11.2018 |
Global: #7093108 05.2010 |
| Best Rank | Swedish: #2495 11.2018 |
Global: #479038 11.2018 |
On 7 February 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Elon Musk, Donald Trump, Bianca Censori, Kanye West, Cristiano Ronaldo, United States Agency for International Development, deaths in 2025, Karla Sofía Gascón, Benson Boone, Irv Gotti.
In Swedish Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Jakob Oftebro, Markus Krunegård, Nina Persson, Åremorden, Peter Apelgren, Helena von Zweigbergk, Marianne Mörck, Sofie Krunegård, Antonio Salieri, Prins Carl Philip.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(11.69+1.04+9.09+21.05+8.56)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
