Article "Gösta Bergholtz" in Swedish Wikipedia has 26.3 points for quality (as of November 1, 2023). The article contains 11 references and 2 sections.
Since the creation of article "Gösta Bergholtz", its content was written by 4 registered users of Swedish Wikipedia and edited by 4 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 10 times in Swedish Wikipedia and cited 10 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from November 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Swedish: #3964 02.2023 |
Global: #735863 02.2023 |
| Best Rank | Swedish: #36255 06.2021 |
Global: #2324924 09.2018 |
On 6 May 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Bernard Hill, YouTube, Eurovision Song Contest 2024, Lando Norris, Anne Hathaway, Facebook, Nicholas Galitzine, ChatGPT, The Idea of You, deaths in 2024.
In Swedish Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Kristi himmelsfärdsdag, Eiffeltornet, Eurovision Song Contest 2024, Taktiska kärnvapen, Kungaskeppet Dannebrog, Gais, Kronprins Frederik av Danmark, Baby Reindeer, Bernard Hill, Alexander Reichenberg.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from November, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from October 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(9.52+11.7+0+10.53+100)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
