Article "After Shave och Anders Eriksson" in Swedish Wikipedia has 3.2 points for quality (as of November 1, 2023). The article contains 0 references and 2 sections. The article also contains quality flaw template, which reduce quality score.
Since the creation of article "After Shave och Anders Eriksson", its content was written by 15 registered users of Swedish Wikipedia and edited by 15 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 106 times in Swedish Wikipedia and cited 106 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from November 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Swedish: #26050 08.2015 |
Global: #1744014 08.2015 |
| Best Rank | Swedish: #4185 05.2007 |
Global: #351160 05.2007 |
On 28 April 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: YouTube, Fallout, Facebook, Baby Reindeer, Challengers, Premier League, Fallout, deaths in 2024, Queen of Tears, Arsenal F.C..
In Swedish Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Stig Larsson (författare), Olle Adolphson, Amanda Lind, 7:3, Valborgsmässoafton, Ludmila Engquist, Baby Reindeer, Sissel Kyrkjebø, Tony Olsson, Bä, bä, vita lamm.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from November, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from October 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(6.37+0+0+10.53+0)-0.17$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
