Article “Циглер, Михаил Карлович” in Russian Wikipedia has 6.4 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 0 references and 3 sections.
Since the creation of article “Циглер, Михаил Карлович”, its content was written by 6 registered users of Russian Wikipedia and edited by 6 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 3 times in Russian Wikipedia and cited 3 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Russian: #1036403 08.2018 |
Global: #6303171 08.2018 |
| Best Rank | Russian: #43372 12.2019 |
Global: #834927 06.2018 |
On 9 December 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Stranger Things, 2026 FIFA World Cup, Lando Norris, Millie Bobby Brown, Sean Combs, It: Welcome to Derry, ChatGPT, Zootopia 2, deaths in 2025, Cassie Ventura.
In Russian Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Ан-22, Яндекс, Убийство Станислава Маркелова и Анастасии Бабуровой, IMGSRC.RU, 1xBet, Очень странные дела, Ян, Пётр Евгеньевич, Долина, Лариса Александровна, Список умерших в 2025 году, YouTube.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(9.36+0+7.69+15+0)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
