Jorge Nova - Brazilian politician. Article "Jorge Nova da Costa" in Portuguese Wikipedia has 26.6 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article contains 14 references and 1 sections.
Since the creation of article "Jorge Nova da Costa", its content was written by 6 registered users of Portuguese Wikipedia and edited by 6 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 24 times in Portuguese Wikipedia and cited 24 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Portuguese: #235653 07.2022 |
Global: #4612992 11.2020 |
| Best Rank | Portuguese: #39944 12.2022 |
Global: #1994129 06.2018 |
On 15 January 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Squid Game, Elon Musk, Squid Game, season 2, deaths in 2025, ChatGPT, Nosferatu, Donald Trump, Neil Gaiman, Pete Hegseth, Greenland.
In Portuguese Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: João Fonseca (tenista), Nikolas Ferreira, Vitória Strada, ChatGPT, Pneumonia por aspiração, Gracyanne Barbosa, Diego Hypólito, Belo (cantor), Daniele Hypólito, Ainda Estou Aqui (filme de 2024).
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(8.51+9.09+9.09+6.25+100)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
