Article "Alfredo Casimiro da Rocha" in Portuguese Wikipedia has 37.9 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article contains 42 references and 7 sections.
Since the creation of article "Alfredo Casimiro da Rocha", its content was written by 4 registered users of Portuguese Wikipedia and edited by 4 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 4 times in Portuguese Wikipedia and cited 4 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Portuguese: #185375 12.2022 |
Global: #4118794 12.2022 |
| Best Rank | Portuguese: #9178 12.2022 |
Global: #932556 07.2022 |
On 19 March 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: assassination of John F. Kennedy, Adolescence, Elon Musk, Gal Gadot, John F. Kennedy, Incel, Sunita Williams, deaths in 2025, ChatGPT, March 19.
In Portuguese Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: São José, Dia dos Pais, Will Smith, Incel, Cláudio Lembo, ChatGPT, Beleza Fatal, Assassinato de John F. Kennedy, Gracyanne Barbosa, Alejandro Domínguez (dirigente esportivo).
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(18.68+27.27+0+43.75+100)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
