Article "Tadeusz Czapczyński" in Polish Wikipedia has 17.7 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article contains 4 references and 6 sections.
Since the creation of article "Tadeusz Czapczyński", its content was written by 19 registered users of Polish Wikipedia and edited by 19 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 8 times in Polish Wikipedia and cited 8 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Polish: #261569 08.2015 |
Global: #4858794 12.2013 |
| Best Rank | Polish: #1175 12.2013 |
Global: #190646 12.2013 |
On 12 November 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Donald Trump, Marco Rubio, Elon Musk, Song Jae-lim, 2024 United States presidential election, Megan Fox, Melania Trump, Gladiator II, ChatGPT, deaths in 2024.
In Polish Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Anne Applebaum, Radosław Sikorski, Michał Witkowski, Blazonowanie, Eliza Michalik, Kinga Gajewska, Donald Trump, Narodowe Święto Niepodległości, Dominik Tarczyński, Agata Kornhauser-Duda.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(13.62+2.63+18.18+35.29+19.01)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
