Article "Kopa Cwila" in Polish Wikipedia has 36.7 points for quality (as of November 1, 2023). The article contains 11 references and 6 sections.
Since the creation of article "Kopa Cwila", its content was written by 16 registered users of Polish Wikipedia and edited by 16 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 12 times in Polish Wikipedia and cited 12 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from November 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Polish: #1154 01.2021 |
Global: #147105 01.2021 |
| Best Rank | Polish: #1389 05.2023 |
Global: #310574 05.2023 |
On 4 June 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Kylian Mbappé, Claudia Sheinbaum, ChatGPT, 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre, Jannik Sinner, YouTube, UEFA Euro 2024, June 4, Carlos Alcaraz, Real Madrid CF.
In Polish Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Janusz Rewiński, Iwona Biernacka, Aleksander Rewiński, Polska Partia Przyjaciół Piwa, Iga Świątek, ChatGPT, Mistrzostwa Europy w Piłce Nożnej 2024, Salim Touahri, Kylian Mbappé, Zbigniew Rau (prawnik).
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from November, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from October 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(4.7+7.38+36.36+35.29+100)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
