Joachim Gacka - association football player (1936-2017). Article “Joachim Gacka” in Polish Wikipedia has 28.2 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 10 references and 5 sections.
Since the creation of article “Joachim Gacka”, its content was written by 7 registered users of Polish Wikipedia and edited by 7 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 3 times in Polish Wikipedia and cited 3 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Polish: #93761 06.2017 |
Global: #2153328 06.2017 |
| Best Rank | Polish: #4795 06.2017 |
Global: #473370 06.2017 |
On 10 March 2026 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Iran, Mojtaba Khamenei, Enhypen, Ali Khamenei, Strait of Hormuz, Jeffrey Epstein, 2026 Iran war, 2026 World Baseball Classic, Donald Trump, World Baseball Classic.
In Polish Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Przemysław Czarnek, Międzynarodowy Dzień Mężczyzn, Iran, Operon, Radio Nowy Świat, Jeffrey Epstein, Jagoda Gancarek, 10 marca, Modżtaba Chamenei, Victor Ambros.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(6.49+6.33+0+29.41+98.61)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
