Article "Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczego w Poznaniu" in Polish Wikipedia has 20.1 points for quality (as of November 1, 2023). The article contains 1 references and 6 sections.
Since the creation of article "Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczego w Poznaniu", its content was written by 9 registered users of Polish Wikipedia and edited by 9 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 48 times in Polish Wikipedia and cited 48 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from November 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Polish: #361343 07.2015 |
Global: #5134384 07.2008 |
| Best Rank | Polish: #6110 01.2017 |
Global: #506966 01.2017 |
On 16 May 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Yasuke, New Caledonia, Slovakia, Robert Fico, Bridgerton, YouTube, ChatGPT, deaths in 2024, Planet of the Apes, May 16.
In Polish Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Robert Fico, Yasuke, Agnieszka Osiecka, Słowacja, Dariusz Joński, Nowa Kaledonia, Zuzana Čaputová, Kierunek – Socjalna Demokracja, Andrzej Bobola, Polska.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from November, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from October 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(4.54+0.67+45.45+35.29+14.61)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
