Article "Tjuvåsen Opp og Ned" in Norwegian Wikipedia has 2.2 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article contains 0 references and 2 sections.
Since the creation of article "Tjuvåsen Opp og Ned", its content was written by 10 registered users of Norwegian Wikipedia and edited by 10 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 2 times in Norwegian Wikipedia and cited 2 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Norwegian: #47130 08.2010 |
Global: #4179628 08.2010 |
| Best Rank | Norwegian: #9018 08.2011 |
Global: #820074 08.2011 |
On 13 April 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Palm Sunday, Black Mirror, Rory McIlroy, ChatGPT, Alexander Volkanovski, A Minecraft Movie, Paddy Pimblett, Adolescence, list of Black Mirror episodes, Diego Lopes.
In Norwegian Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Forside, Gamle Oslo Fotballklubb, Palmesøndag, Asgeir Helgestad, MS «Scandinavian Star», Påske, Wisting (TV-serie), Paris–Roubaix, Adam Larsen Kwarasey, Norgesmesterskapet i fotball for menn 2025.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(2.96+0+0+8+0)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
