Article "Reid Gilje" in Norwegian Wikipedia has 9.7 points for quality (as of November 1, 2023). The article contains 1 references and 3 sections. The article also contains quality flaw template, which reduce quality score.
In October 2023 the article "Reid Gilje" was edited by 1 authors in Norwegian Wikipedia and written by 1 authors in all languages.
Since the creation of article "Reid Gilje", its content was written by 7 registered users of Norwegian Wikipedia and edited by 7 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 14 times in Norwegian Wikipedia and cited 14 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from November 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Norwegian: #19208 03.2023 |
Global: #3189504 03.2023 |
On 28 April 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: YouTube, Fallout, Facebook, Baby Reindeer, Challengers, Premier League, Fallout, deaths in 2024, Queen of Tears, Arsenal F.C..
In Norwegian Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Finn.no, Carl Larsson, Beheim Karlsen-saken, Kompani Lauritzen, Facebook, KFUM-Kameratene Oslo, Premier League, Sistemann ut, Line Andersen, Yr.no.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from November, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from October 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(3.88+0.83+11.76+12+22.43)-0.51$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
