Article "Johannes Westergaard" in Norwegian Wikipedia has 1 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article also contains quality flaw template, which reduce quality score.
Since the creation of article "Johannes Westergaard", its content was written by 8 registered users of Norwegian Wikipedia and edited by 8 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 11 times in Norwegian Wikipedia and cited 11 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Norwegian: #65048 01.2014 |
Global: #4785770 01.2014 |
| Best Rank | Norwegian: #10074 09.2015 |
Global: #891632 09.2015 |
On 15 January 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Squid Game, Elon Musk, Squid Game, season 2, deaths in 2025, ChatGPT, Nosferatu, Donald Trump, Neil Gaiman, Pete Hegseth, Greenland.
In Norwegian Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Forside, Håndball-VM 2025 for menn, Brynjar Meling, William Heimdal, Odd Nerdrum, Generasjon Z, Norges herrelandslag i håndball, Frithjof Wilborn, Emilie Voe Nereng, Ingrid Lorentzen.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(1.3+0+0+4+0)-0.05$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
