Jeroen van Dommelen - Dutch journalist. Article "Jeroen van Dommelen" in Dutch Wikipedia has 0.4 points for quality (as of November 1, 2023).
Since the creation of article "Jeroen van Dommelen", its content was written by 15 registered users of Dutch Wikipedia and edited by 15 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 3 times in Dutch Wikipedia and cited 3 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from November 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Dutch: #70992 08.2018 |
Global: #2546110 08.2018 |
| Best Rank | Dutch: #9815 03.2020 |
Global: #500432 12.2007 |
On 4 August 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Novak Djokovic, 2024 Summer Olympics, Imane Khelif, Saint Lucia, Carlos Alcaraz, Simone Biles, Usain Bolt, 100 metres, list of Olympic medalists in tennis, Deadpool & Wolverine.
In Dutch Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Femke Bol, Marianne Vos, Steven van de Velde, Novak Djokovic, Johan Cruijff Schaal, Moniek Tenniglo, Eugene Omalla, Carlos Alcaraz (tennisser), Saint Lucia, Lijst van olympische medaillewinnaars tennis.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from November, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from October 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(1.82+0+0+0+0)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
