Article "Gandingos piliakalnis" in Lithuanian Wikipedia has 14.1 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article contains 3 references and 6 sections.
Since the creation of article "Gandingos piliakalnis", its content was written by 5 registered users of Lithuanian Wikipedia and edited by 5 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
Gandinga hillfort is on the 205th place in local ranking of buildings on Lithuanian Wikipedia in all the time.
The article is cited 30 times in Lithuanian Wikipedia and cited 30 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Lithuanian: #6646 07.2023 |
Global: #2306292 10.2009 |
On 20 December 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Magdeburg, Mufasa: The Lion King, Elon Musk, Mazan rape case, Gisèle Pelicot, Superman, Ayrton Senna, Isack Hadjar, deaths in 2024, David Corenswet.
In Lithuanian Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Vilerbano ASVEL, Šeivikaulis, Facebook, Zodiakas, Henrikas Daktaras, Gaivusis gėrimas, Kūčios, Gediminas, Arvydas Sabonis, Kauno Žalgiris.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(11.21+2.33+9.52+24+23.62)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
