This company is the 345th most popular in Korean Wikipedia. Article "이든나인" in Korean Wikipedia has 5.6 points for quality (as of November 1, 2023). The article contains 0 references and 6 sections.
In October 2023 the article "이든나인" was edited by 1 authors in Korean Wikipedia and written by 1 authors in all languages.
Since the creation of article "이든나인", its content was written by 5 registered users of Korean Wikipedia and edited by 5 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
Eden9 is on the 345th place in local ranking of business on Korean Wikipedia in all the time.
The article is cited 4 times in Korean Wikipedia and cited 4 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from November 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Korean: #74 07.2013 |
Global: #124274 07.2013 |
On 23 April 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: YouTube, Serie A, Shōgun, Fallout, Facebook, Fallout, Saint George, Saint George Day, Inter Milan, ChatGPT.
In Korean Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: 문화방송, 유영재 (1963년), 선우은숙, 한국방송공사, 임예진, 대한민국의 국민연금, 한국교육방송공사, 아일릿, 변우석, 유튜브.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from November, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from October 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(0.68+0+0+27.27+0)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
