Article “1900년 하계 올림픽 메달리스트” in Korean Wikipedia has 30 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 0 references and 23 sections.
Since the creation of article “1900년 하계 올림픽 메달리스트”, its content was written by 3 registered users of Korean Wikipedia and edited by 3 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 2 times in Korean Wikipedia and cited 2 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Korean: #24179 07.2010 |
Global: #2366482 07.2010 |
| Best Rank | Korean: #22403 08.2024 |
Global: #1610339 07.2010 |
On 18 November 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: 2026 FIFA World Cup, 2026 FIFA World Cup qualification (UEFA), 2026 FIFA World Cup qualification, Jeffrey Epstein, ChatGPT, Kessler Twins, Cloudflare, Sheikh Hasina, 2026 FIFA World Cup qualification (inter-confederation play-offs), 2026 FIFA World Cup qualification – UEFA second round.
In Korean Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: 문화방송, 페이즈 (프로게이머), 한국방송공사, 한국교육방송공사, 카카오톡, 아랍에미리트, 박찬호 (1995년), Cloudflare, 그린 수소, 기후변화.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(50.02+0+0+100+0)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
