자바와 C++의 비교

Quality:

Comparison of Java and C++ - comparison between two coding languages. Article "자바와 C++의 비교" in Korean Wikipedia has 21 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 6 references and 11 sections.

This article has the best quality in Chinese Wikipedia. However, the most popular language version of this article is English.

Since the creation of article "자바와 C++의 비교", its content was written by 21 registered users of Korean Wikipedia and edited by 428 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.

The article is cited 26 times in Korean Wikipedia and cited 137 times in all languages.

The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:

• Local (Korean): #1102 in September 2008
• Global: #474 in March 2002

The highest popularity rank from 2008:

• Local (Korean): #6638 in April 2008
• Global: #34225 in February 2013

There are 6 language versions for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).

The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).

The table below shows the language versions of the article with the highest quality.

#	Language	Quality grade	Quality score
1	Chinese (zh) Java和C++的對照		46.7462
2	English (en) Comparison of Java and C++		41.9999
3	Korean (ko) 자바와 C++의 비교		20.9913
4	Japanese (ja) JavaとC++の比較		18.4706
5	Norwegian (no) Forskjeller mellom C++ og Java		15.406
6	Finnish (fi) Java- ja C++-ohjelmointikielten vertailu		8.4319

The following table shows the most popular language versions of the article.

#	Language	Popularity award	Relative popularity
1	English (en) Comparison of Java and C++		2 777 094
2	Japanese (ja) JavaとC++の比較		272 288
3	Chinese (zh) Java和C++的對照		239 788
4	Korean (ko) 자바와 C++의 비교		96 886
5	Norwegian (no) Forskjeller mellom C++ og Java		9 903
6	Finnish (fi) Java- ja C++-ohjelmointikielten vertailu		409

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest popularity in the last month.

#	Language	Popularity award	Relative popularity
1	English (en) Comparison of Java and C++		2 558
2	Chinese (zh) Java和C++的對照		225
3	Japanese (ja) JavaとC++の比較		114
4	Korean (ko) 자바와 C++의 비교		40
5	Norwegian (no) Forskjeller mellom C++ og Java		11
6	Finnish (fi) Java- ja C++-ohjelmointikielten vertailu		5

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest.

#	Language	AI award	Relative AI
1	English (en) Comparison of Java and C++		322
2	Japanese (ja) JavaとC++の比較		30
3	Chinese (zh) Java和C++的對照		30
4	Korean (ko) 자바와 C++의 비교		21
5	Norwegian (no) Forskjeller mellom C++ og Java		19
6	Finnish (fi) Java- ja C++-ohjelmointikielten vertailu		6

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest in the last month.

#	Language	AI award	Relative AI
1	Chinese (zh) Java和C++的對照		1
2	English (en) Comparison of Java and C++		0
3	Finnish (fi) Java- ja C++-ohjelmointikielten vertailu		0
4	Japanese (ja) JavaとC++の比較		0
5	Korean (ko) 자바와 C++의 비교		0
6	Norwegian (no) Forskjeller mellom C++ og Java		0

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest number of citations.

On 12 August 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Cristiano Ronaldo, Wednesday, Georgina Rodríguez, ChatGPT, Weapons, Jenna Ortega, deaths in 2025, Taylor Swift, Miguel Uribe Turbay, 2025–26 UEFA Champions League.

In Korean Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: 문화방송, 김건희, 한국방송공사, 한국교육방송공사, 케이팝 데몬 헌터스, 윤미향, 유경촌, 노란봉투법, 윤석열, 강미정.

The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information