Article “앰코 테크놀로지 코리아” in Korean Wikipedia has 13.4 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 2 references and 4 sections. The article also contains templates indicating quality issues, therefore its score was reduced by 0.71 points.
Since the creation of article “앰코 테크놀로지 코리아”, its content was written by 11 registered users of Korean Wikipedia and edited by 11 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 4 times in Korean Wikipedia and cited 4 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Korean: #2495 12.2011 |
Global: #652554 01.2025 |
| Best Rank | Korean: #2052 11.2019 |
Global: #464225 11.2018 |
On 13 October 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Diane Keaton, Ed Gein, 2026 FIFA World Cup qualification, 2026 FIFA World Cup, 2026 FIFA World Cup qualification (UEFA), Ian Watkins, 2026 FIFA World Cup qualification (CAF), Ilse Koch, Donald Trump, ChatGPT.
In Korean Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: 문화방송, 한국방송공사, 한국교육방송공사, 최혁진, 원태인, 윤민수, 조민기, 김다미, 카카오톡, 조희대.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(3.27+1.32+7.69+18.18+40.17)-0.71$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
