Article "Алмас Әбенұлы Сұлтанғазин" in Kazakh Wikipedia has 13.8 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article contains 2 references and 1 sections.
Since the creation of article "Алмас Әбенұлы Сұлтанғазин", its content was written by 3 registered users of Kazakh Wikipedia and edited by 3 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 2 times in Kazakh Wikipedia and cited 2 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Kazakh: #13727 01.2022 |
Global: #4976182 01.2022 |
| Best Rank | Kazakh: #1071 06.2013 |
Global: #869152 08.2011 |
On 1 May 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: International Workers' Day, Lamine Yamal, Thunderbolts*, Pope Francis, deaths in 2025, Michael Waltz, Benedict XVI, Natalia Grace Barnett, May 1, Sinners.
In Kazakh Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Қазақстан халқының бірлігі күні, Шоқан Шыңғысұлы Уәлиханов, Абай Құнанбайұлы, Ермұхан Бекмаханұлы Бекмаханов, Бауыржан Момышұлы, Күнделік.кз, Сарматтар, 17 мамыр, Ахмет Байтұрсынұлы, Ыбырай Алтынсарин.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(3.56+2.47+0+3.23+59.63)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
