Article "京都殺人案内" in Japanese Wikipedia has 13.7 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article contains 6 references and 12 sections. The article also contains quality flaw template, which reduce quality score.
In July 2024 the article "京都殺人案内" was edited by 1 authors in Japanese Wikipedia and written by 1 authors in all languages.
Since the creation of article "京都殺人案内", its content was written by 64 registered users of Japanese Wikipedia and edited by 64 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 273 times in Japanese Wikipedia and cited 273 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Japanese: #2724 02.2018 |
Global: #70246 02.2010 |
On 26 June 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: 2025 FIFA Club World Cup, Jeff Bezos, Zohran Mamdani, Lauren Sánchez, Northrop B-2 Spirit, 2025 NBA draft, F1, FIFA Club World Cup, 28 Years Later, Ali Khamenei.
In Japanese Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: 宮島三郎, 椎名林檎, 福田典子, TOKIO, ジャイアント・ホグウィード, 引田天功 (2代目), 蒼井優, 光宗薫, 国分太一, 長瀬智也.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(19.88+2.24+0+38.71+11.28)-0.72$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
