Twin Wave - radio program in Japan. Article “Twin Wave” in Japanese Wikipedia has 10 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 4 references and 7 sections. The article also contains templates indicating quality issues, therefore its score was reduced by 0.53 points.
Since the creation of article “Twin Wave”, its content was written by 12 registered users of Japanese Wikipedia and edited by 12 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 18 times in Japanese Wikipedia and cited 18 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Japanese: #304423 05.2016 |
Global: #2088190 05.2016 |
| Best Rank | Japanese: #6693 10.2017 |
Global: #333662 10.2017 |
On 10 March 2026 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Iran, Mojtaba Khamenei, Enhypen, Ali Khamenei, Strait of Hormuz, Jeffrey Epstein, 2026 Iran war, 2026 World Baseball Classic, Donald Trump, World Baseball Classic.
In Japanese Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: 周東佑京, 警察庁長官狙撃事件, 谷原七音, 東日本大震災, オンドジェイ・サトリア, The GazettE, 金丸夢斗, 髙橋宏斗, ワールド・ベースボール・クラシック, チェコ.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(6.52+1.44+0+22.58+22.18)-0.53$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
