Article "Revision of Sence" in Japanese Wikipedia has 13.8 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article contains 1 references and 14 sections. The article also contains quality flaw template, which reduce quality score.
Since the creation of article "Revision of Sence", its content was written by 23 registered users of Japanese Wikipedia and edited by 23 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 53 times in Japanese Wikipedia and cited 53 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Japanese: #36676 09.2017 |
Global: #359726 09.2017 |
| Best Rank | Japanese: #10387 12.2018 |
Global: #424490 06.2018 |
On 1 February 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Donald Trump, Marianne Faithfull, O. J. Simpson, Neymar, Israel Adesanya, Nassourdine Imavov, Royal Rumble (2025): The Death of Professional Wrestling, Elon Musk, Karla Sofía Gascón, Emilia Pérez.
In Japanese Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: 青木歌音, The pillows, 織田梨沙, 節分, 桜庭ななみ, 中嶋優一, 蓮佛美沙子, 德勝龍誠, 長谷川豊, 萬田久子.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(29.66+0.37+0+45.16+1.26)-1.53$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
