Article "NNNニュースダッシュ" in Japanese Wikipedia has 15.2 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article contains 4 references and 15 sections. The article also contains quality flaw template, which reduce quality score.
In July 2024 the article "NNNニュースダッシュ" was edited by 1 authors in Japanese Wikipedia and written by 1 authors in all languages.
Since the creation of article "NNNニュースダッシュ", its content was written by 74 registered users of Japanese Wikipedia and edited by 74 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 204 times in Japanese Wikipedia and cited 204 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Japanese: #101543 03.2008 |
Global: #562336 03.2008 |
On 26 December 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Squid Game, Boxing Day, 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake, Squid Game, season 2, Hanukkah, Azerbaijan Airlines Flight 8243, Empress Elisabeth of Austria, Nosferatu, Mufasa: The Lion King, Gladiator II.
In Japanese Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: 渡邊渚, 園子温, 地獄でなぜ悪い, 令和ロマン, 真由子, バッテリィズ, 源田壮亮, 南場智子, 中居正広, 中嶋優一.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(23.86+1.49+0+48.39+6.27)-0.8$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
