Article "Baby ＃1" in Japanese Wikipedia has 6.4 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article contains 2 references and 4 sections. The article also contains quality flaw template, which reduce quality score.
In July 2024 the article "Baby ＃1" was edited by 1 authors in Japanese Wikipedia and written by 1 authors in all languages.
Since the creation of article "Baby ＃1", its content was written by 10 registered users of Japanese Wikipedia and edited by 10 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 76 times in Japanese Wikipedia and cited 76 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Japanese: #251102 05.2010 |
Global: #1846859 05.2010 |
| Best Rank | Japanese: #12007 05.2010 |
Global: #378944 05.2010 |
On 19 March 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: assassination of John F. Kennedy, Adolescence, Elon Musk, Gal Gadot, John F. Kennedy, Incel, Sunita Williams, deaths in 2025, ChatGPT, March 19.
In Japanese Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: 友寄隆英, 佐々木朗希, 鈴木誠也, 大谷翔平, ナスD大冒険TV, 近藤正臣, 春分の日, 今永昇太, LISA (歌手), ケネディ大統領暗殺事件.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(4.88+0.75+0+12.9+15.33)-0.34$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
