This software is the 8158th most popular in the global Wikipedia ranking of software. Article “Ansem” in Japanese Wikipedia has 2.3 points for quality (as of July 1, 2026). The article contains 0 references and 3 sections.
Since the creation of article “Ansem”, its content was written by 10 registered users of Japanese Wikipedia and edited by 10 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
Ansem is on the 8158th place in global ranking of software on Wikipedia in all the time.
The article is cited 1 times in Japanese Wikipedia and cited 1 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2026 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Japanese: #230065 01.2008 |
Global: #1294908 01.2008 |
| Best Rank | Japanese: #10070 06.2019 |
Global: #340294 12.2007 |
On 1 July 2026 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: 2026 FIFA World Cup, Kylian Mbappé, Erling Haaland, Democratic Republic of the Congo, FIFA World Cup, Harry Kane, Romelu Lukaku, Senegal, Michael Olise, Sadio Mané.
In Japanese Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: 橋本愛 (1996年生), 超ときめき♡宣伝部, 塩貝健人, 鈴木彩艶, 泉里香, 谷口彰悟, 田中みな実, 佐野海舟, アーリング・ハーランド, 後藤輝樹.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 50 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2026. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2026 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2026... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(1.84+0+0+9.68+0)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
