Masakazu Amahisa - Japanese mangaka and animator. Article "天久聖一" in Japanese Wikipedia has 41.8 points for quality (as of November 1, 2023). The article contains 67 references and 19 sections.
In October 2023 the article "天久聖一" was edited by 1 authors in Japanese Wikipedia and written by 1 authors in all languages.
Since the creation of article "天久聖一", its content was written by 109 registered users of Japanese Wikipedia and edited by 109 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 104 times in Japanese Wikipedia and cited 104 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from November 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Japanese: #45324 08.2009 |
Global: #287295 02.2008 |
On 22 May 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Ademola Lookman, Atalanta BC, Toni Kroos, Gian Piero Gasperini, Bayer 04 Leverkusen, international recognition of the State of Palestine, UEFA Europa League, Ebrahim Raisi, State of Palestine, YouTube.
In Japanese Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: 中尾彬, 古谷徹, 池波志乃, 袴田事件, 光原エミカ, 江守徹, 小山茉美, 林田理沙, 袴田巌, 井上和彦 (声優).
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from November, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from October 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(25.48+24.72+0+61.29+97.63)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
