Article "Sarcofago di Thutmose I (04.278.1)" in Italian Wikipedia has 30.3 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article contains 13 references and 5 sections.
Since the creation of article "Sarcofago di Thutmose I (04.278.1)", its content was written by 8 registered users of Italian Wikipedia and edited by 8 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 4 times in Italian Wikipedia and cited 4 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Italian: #469420 07.2017 |
Global: #5898620 07.2017 |
| Best Rank | Italian: #133305 11.2020 |
Global: #1948354 01.2019 |
On 12 November 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Donald Trump, Marco Rubio, Elon Musk, Song Jae-lim, 2024 United States presidential election, Megan Fox, Melania Trump, Gladiator II, ChatGPT, deaths in 2024.
In Italian Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: The Help (film), Elon Musk, L'amica geniale (serie televisiva), Taylor Fritz, Il ragazzo dai pantaloni rosa, Vincenzo Montella, Attentati di Nāṣiriya, Jannik Sinner, Delitto di Avetrana, Claudio Ranieri.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(5.95+7.83+15.79+21.74+100)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
